ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 36076|回复: 40

[SC悬赏令] [求助] og16 31题

[复制链接]
发表于 2015-11-2 16:03:29 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
31. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.
(A) The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as
(B) Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
(C) That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as
(D) One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was
(E) Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being 答案是D 没问题


这是OG解答


Logical predication; Grammatical construction; Rhetorical construction The intended meaning of the sentence is that the rapid movement of people across North America is one explanation of the similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region. As worded, however, the sentence is illogical: The sentence indicates that the similarity in artifacts was a rapid movement of people, which makes no sense. Instead of equating similarity with movement, the sentence needs to identify this movement of people as a cause of similarity among artifacts.
A  As worded, this version of the sentence makes the illogical statement that the similarity among artifacts is explainable as a very rapid movement. It should specify that the similarity of artifacts may be a consequence of the rapid population movement.
B This version of the sentence is syntactically awkward, and leaves unclear what the main subject, one explanation is supposed to be an explanation of.
C Like (A), this version of the sentence equates the similarity of artifacts with the movement of people, when a causal connection is what is intended. D Correct. This version adequately expresses the intended causal connection.
E This version is awkward, introducing the causal connection with the unnecessarily wordy and indirect string of prepositional phrases, with one explanation for this. . . .




1.为什么OG上对A的句意解释是 “相似是迁移的结果”   我理解的A的句意是  “相似是迁移”  这二者有什么区别吗?  是不是as的意思导致了解读句意的不同,OG解释AS做‘因为’的意思,而我理解的as 是当 ‘作为’ 的意思   到底应该是那种呀?
2.关于B选项,有NN能解释一下吗?虽然知道他不对,可是就是不知道怎么说它到底如何错的,OG解答完全不理解的样子。    关于B选项前面这个修饰语还有些疑惑,being前面的 Thule artifacts 在语法结构上是做什么的,暗示了什么。这个可以把这个Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region当initial modifier来看吗? Being在这里到底是什么性质?


跪求解答呀!!!!!!跪求有人能详细分析一下B选项!如果有相关知识点就更好啦!!!!!


 楼主| 发表于 2015-11-2 16:05:04 | 显示全部楼层
自己顶一个,求帮助呀求帮助
 楼主| 发表于 2015-11-2 16:12:05 | 显示全部楼层
求解答 谢谢大家啦
 楼主| 发表于 2015-11-4 09:23:21 | 显示全部楼层
还是没有人吗?
发表于 2015-11-19 10:01:28 | 显示全部楼层
非牛,只是说下自己的理解
A中,把修饰成分去掉看的话,整句话的主谓是:the remarkable similarity can be explained as a very rapid movement. 相似性是移动 。这个逻辑意思是很奇怪的。而D中说:对于这种相似性的解释是因为之前出现过一个人口迁徙。把这种awkward的逻辑意思avoid掉了。
B中,一般在GMAT的语法中,being总是显得awkward,除非遇到介词+being adj./adv.或者is/was being done 这种表示被动的正在进行的话,轻易不要选
另外,假设B是对的,则one explanation应该是句子主语,前面那个如果是独立主格的话,先不说being奇怪,前面一句也不能理解为是对后面一句条件/原因的补充
发表于 2015-11-19 10:03:26 | 显示全部楼层
非牛,只是说下自己的理解
A中,把修饰成分去掉看的话,整句话的主谓是:the remarkable similarity can be explained as a very rapid movement. 相似性是移动 。这个逻辑意思是很奇怪的。而D中说:对于这种相似性的解释是因为之前出现过一个人口迁徙。把这种awkward的逻辑意思avoid掉了。
B中,一般在GMAT的语法中,being总是显得awkward,除非遇到介词+being adj./adv.或者is/was being done 这种表示被动的正在进行的话,轻易不要选
另外,假设B是对的,则one explanation应该是句子主语,前面那个如果是独立主格的话,先不说being奇怪,前面一句也不能理解为是对后面一句条件/原因的补充, 从而就无从说明one explanation到底是explain for what了
发表于 2015-12-8 21:12:56 | 显示全部楼层
我很想问下C,THAT 引导了一个主语从句,所以is是对的呀,that引导的主语从句表示一个事,这个事被解释为后面的内容,怎么不对了呢?避免了A中similarity 与 movement 错。
发表于 2016-1-9 16:36:09 | 显示全部楼层

我當初也錯選C
但重看Manhattan後 覺得這個AS是其中所說的preposition as,
前開應為「function」 as; 「equation」 as; 「stage」 as 中的「equation」 as
而無論A(相似性)或C(T工藝品在一個廣泛區域內的顯著相似性)選項的句意(「等同」people的快速遷移)都不可能是對的
所以OG才會說AC應為因果關係(因為快速遷移而造成相似性的結果)而均為錯誤選項
希望有幫上忙,如有錯誤歡迎指正~
发表于 2016-1-9 20:51:35 | 显示全部楼层
C选项我不是特别会解释但是B我觉得错的很明显
(B) Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
第一个分句,名词+V-ing,只有可能是独立主格或者是同位语,如果是独立主格,那么应该修饰整个句子,逻辑不对,看上去最有可能是同位语,那么如果是同位语就是修饰下一个句子的one explanation,也不对。
发表于 2016-1-9 21:19:25 | 显示全部楼层
小镜子儿 发表于 2016-1-9 20:51
C选项我不是特别会解释但是B我觉得错的很明显
(B) Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a ...

不好意思 我对B选项的答案解释中还有个疑问: OG说B中one explanation is supposed to be an explanation of, 为什么说应该为an explanation of 呢?求解答,谢谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 21:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部