ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs. Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same. But new tax breaks will substantially lower the cost of doing business within the city. Therefore, in the future, profit margins will be higher at seafood stores within the city than at suburban seafood stores.

For the purposes of evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to know whether

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 15808|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]gwd-24-37

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-20 12:28:00 | 显示全部楼层

答案D,


Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs. Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same. But new tax breaks will substantially lower the cost of doing business within the city. Therefore, in the future, profit margins will be higher at seafood stores within the city than at suburban seafood stores.


文中说目前市内外的成本是一样的,但如果新的减税政策出台后,成本高了,有可能导致市内销售利润的减少,反之,无论低还是持平,都为市内销售带来利润。



E,说市内销售价格因为减税还要调低,低过郊外销售价格,是一个无关选项,设定价格的高低并不能导致利润的增减。



供讨论。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-14 19:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部