求IR43题第一问（自己想通啦~~~大家来看看对不对）

追风ChaseWind

Reasoning diagram:

Professor A: contends to limit efforts in three aspects as below:
1.    Spending on primary school in poorest area
2.    roviding medicine and other basic supply for health care
3.    A few key agriculture initiatives

Professor B: road better than a teacher <-- if local people could transport the products, they will pay for school and make sure the effects

Purpose: we need two options:
1.    rofessor A opposed
2.    rofessor B will use it to support 1.

It will be easy if we start from confirming the “2”, Viz. professor B will agree with it:
Only F is closed to it

Then we need confirm “1”
The key is which one is the “2” support, viz. not put so much money on school, obviously, only C.

In test, up to now, it is ok; we do not need further more work. But right now, we can:

Professor contends: limit efforts in three aspects, viz. the total amount should be reduced. That purpose is the key, not just reduced efforts in just one aspect, not two aspects. The “C” only address one aspect, so it is against to the professor’s argument.

追风ChaseWind

The aid industry should begin to limit its efforts (to spending on primary schools, providing medicines and other basic supplies for health care, and to a few key agriculture initiatives.)

括号中的内容是修饰efforts, 即，限制（）的努力。