ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3518|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

(AI90)按格式重发,help, issue90

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-7 19:52:00 | 显示全部楼层

(AI90)按格式重发,help, issue90

90. “People often complain that products are not made to last. They feel that making products that wear out fairly quickly wastes both natural and human resources. What they fail to see, however, is that such manufacturing practices keep costs down for the consumer and stimulate demand.”

如何理解范文中quality-cutting product results in a net benefit to consumers and overall economy?

从市场角度而言,是否任何产品都不应该生产耐用品呢??

因本人非经济专业出身,这个基本问题十分困扰我,以至于难以理解这个题目,请求诸位赐教!!拜谢!

范文中的提纲:1,这种方式对消费者和对整个经济都有利

                          2, 并没有浪费劳动资源

                           3,并没有浪费自然资源

关于后两个段落,诸位可否有恰当例子分享??


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-12 09:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部