本贴相关题目 TN-05-CR-28 (ZPJF)

00:00:00

Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville create sun acceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.

Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.

Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.

Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?

AChallenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
BChallenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
CMaintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
DClaiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist's position in order to be better able to attack it
EDenying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people

正确答案: E

GWD-2-10

[复制链接]

dream1111

楼主

发表于 2004-9-20 05:36:00 | 显示全部楼层

Comparatively, i think, C is better than E.

In E, the 'an effect' which ' having benefited a certain group of people' should prefer to that by 'many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months', the benifits actually exist, rather than not exist. to deny its existence is not right.