ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 34872|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 3-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-20 14:42:00 | 显示全部楼层

I make the same mistake as you do at my first reading.


Because the abolishment of agreement occured in 1871, it is unnecessary for congress to sign agreement with minority at that time.


Many


commentators believe that this change


had already occurred in 1871 when—


following a dispute between the


       House and the Senate over which


(25)       chamber should enjoy primacy in


Indian affairs—Congress abolished


the making of treaties with Native


American tribes.  But in reality the


federal government continued to nego-


(30)      tiate formal tribal agreements past


the turn of the century, treating these(formal agreements)


documents not as treaties with sover-


       eign nations requiring ratification by the


Senate but simply as legislation to be


(35)       passed by both houses of Congress.


To be discussed...

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-20 17:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部