Dear Jon, Thanks a lot for your dedication for helping the Chinese applicants. May I ask a question about how school values applicants' background? Do you think that the applicant's company brand helps with the profile? How about the job function? I'm curious how the schools value the non-mainstream jobs in a blue chip company. For example, HR person from McKinsey, IT person from Morgan Stanley or Operation person from UBS. I understand that it's the whole package that counts, but I'd like to learn if these company name helps even if you are in a non mainstream division. By observing the admits on chasedream, I found that HBS tends to admit student from IB/PE background. Do you agree they have that preference? BTW, Jon, do you think the undergraduate school reputation makes a difference? Top 2 local schools are well known. What about top 5, top 10? Does it make a difference in the application? Or Adcom only cares about famous undergraduate schools in US & UK? Thanks in adavance. -- by 会员 CDJJMM (2010/12/20 19:11:37)
Hey there! All good questions. To answer your first question, yes brand can help. But not if it means that you didn’t have any good job responsibilities. As we have mentioned—BOTH are positive for applications. Either working at a brand name company, or doing a lot of cool stuff. That is why the folks with BOTH of these experiences get into bschool. It is great to have both great responsibilities, AND experience with a great firm. It is also rare. So yes, the name can help—but so can job responsibilities. And if you are doing a LOT (even if for the IT group at Goldman, etc.) you’re in business. In terms of HBS, they have been surprising a lot of people this year. A few more PhDs this year than previously, and a few LESS big name PE and IB guys. With their new dean, they appear to be shooting for less traditional candidates. And yes, schools DO know great schools from less great ones—even in China. We in the US know some top undergrad schools in China—great undergrad programs are especially meaningful in making up for weak gmat scores…
Jon Frank
|