P1 + P2: 介绍Staw的Study on Escalation Bias - Staw 1976的study on escalation bias: manager reinvest projects that have gone poorly.
- Manager believe that other managers suffer from escalation bias.
- explain P1 提到的 study
- Manager tend to invest more in projects had not done well
P3: 介绍ACS的Study on Escalation Bias - ACS三位重新研究这个study,并变更了context
- R&D investment -> Advertising investment or product design investment
- Dates -> contemporary
- Result: Did not support the original findings. Escalation bias did not generalize to these market decisions
P4: 对比分析两种studies,并用 ACS 反驳了 Staw - 一方面:ACS 和 Staw的study结果不完全冲突,ACS进一步定义了escalation bias generalize 的limits
- 另一方面:ACS shows that research findings about escalation bias are not generalizable
- ACS的结论:Staw 的study设计不合理,对manager无用
- Supports on ACS结论:实验对象没有receive enough info on future profitability for rational decision
|