[求助]LSAT-4-1-10

搜过了……发现没有人问过……是不是这个问题特别傻啊……算了丢人就丢人了，豁出去了

Auto industry executive: Statistics show that cars that were built smaller after 1977 to make them more fuel-efficient had a higher incidence of accident-related fatalities than did their earlier larger counterparts. For this reason we oppose recent guidelines that would require us to produce cars with higher fuel efficiency.

Which of the following, if true, would constitute the strongest objection to the executive’s argument?

(A) Even after 1977, large automobiles were frequently involved in accidents that caused death or serious injury.

(B) Although fatalities in accidents involving small cars have increased since 1977, the number of accidents has decreased.

(C) New computerized fuel systems can enable large cars to meet fuel efficiency standards established by the recent guidelines.

(D) Modern technology can make small cars more fuel-efficient today than at any other time in their production history.（C）

(E) Fuel efficiency in models of large cars rose immediately after 1977 but has been declining ever since.

up~!

这里题干犯的错误在于 making cars smaller is just one of the many ways to achieve  fuel-efficiency

we cannot deny the goal of " fuel-efficiency " just because one way to achieve it  is unreasonable

in C  New computerized fuel systems is another way of  achieving the goal and it does not have any safe problems

小车（省油）---->事故率比以前大的时候高；

argument：反对造省油的车。

他的推论是 省油---->事故高，因果错误

应该是小车---->事故率高。

C说大车也可以省油，而题目中说的大车事故率低于小车

睡了一觉起来忽然懂了！谢谢大家！

果然钻牛角尖的时候一定要立马去睡觉

呵呵，复习gmat的时候休息很重要