ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1350|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

36套的一个题目,求定位。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-6-7 08:37:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Exercise 22, Question 8. 这道题我都不知道在哪里定位.笔记上说--批评者和选项的观点都是都是缺乏能力导致结果而非刻意如此做,答案C;

In Raisin in the Sun, Lorraine Hansberry does not reject
integration or the economic and moral promise of the
American dream; rather, she remains loyal to this dream
while looking, realistically, at its incomplete realization.
Once we recognize this dual vision, we can accept the
play's ironic nuances as deliberate social commentaries by
Bigsby attributes to the work. Indeed a curiously persistent
refusal to credit Hansberry with a capacity for intentional
irony has led some critics to interpret the play's thematic
conflicts as mere confusion, contradiction, or eclecticism.
Isaacs, for example, cannot easily reconcile Hansberry's
intense concern for her race with her ideal of human
reconciliation. But the play's complex view of Black
self-esteem and human solidarity as compatible is no more
"contradictory" than Du Bois' famous, well-considered
ideal of ethnic self-awareness coexisting with human unity,
or Fanon's emphasis on an ideal internationalism that also
accommodates national identities and roles.


8.The author of the passage would probably consider
which of the following judgments to be most similar
accommodates national identities and roles.

(A) The world is certainly flat; therefore, the person
proposing to sail around it is unquestionably
foolhardy.
(B) Radioactivity cannot be directly perceived;
therefore, a scientist could not possibly control
it in a laboratory.
(C) The painter of this picture could not intend it to
be funny, therefore, its humor must result
from a lack of skill.
(D) Traditional social mores are beneficial to culture;
therefore, anyone who deviates from
them acts destructively.
(E) Filmmakers who produce documentaries deal
exclusively with facts; therefore, a filmmaker
who reinterprets particular events is misleading us.






收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-6-7 11:33:56 | 只看该作者
都是主观不足造成的吧
板凳
发表于 2013-6-7 11:58:39 | 只看该作者
“Indeed a curiously persistent refusal to credit Hansberry with a capacity for intentional irony has led some critics to interpret the play's thematic conflicts as mere confusion, contradiction, or eclecticism.”
评论家们的“错误”在于不承认H有刻意制造讽刺的能力,所以才会把他的“conflicts” interpret成confusion...
要选的analogy应该是包含这种stereotype的,就是“我就不觉得你行!”
ABD质疑的对象都是facts,总之是客观存在的东西,而不是对某人的xxx,跟原文的“stereotype”不搭
E,虽然是人,但后来反的不是人的能力,也差点意思。
C很完美,这画家就是没幽默感,他幽默作品肯定很捉急,跟原文异曲同工。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-17 21:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部