ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1491|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

weaken题求助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-5-21 16:45:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called "historical costing." Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year's contractual price.
Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?
(A) The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
(8) The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
(C) The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.
(D) Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.
(E) The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.

我选了C,答案是A 但是我实在搞不清楚A选项哪里weaken了,求大神解答




收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-5-28 15:17:09 | 只看该作者
原文说,政府依据一个历史cost对military contractor付费。历史成本能够怎么怎么样,问哪个能够weaken历史成本的有效性。
看选项A 政府可能因为历史成本而持续的付费,这些费用是inefficient的。有点关系,留着;
   B 通货膨胀怎么怎么着,杀。
   C 合同价格被材料的成本影响,不能有效weaken。
   D 许多纳税人怎么怎么着,无关,杀。
   E 这个计费方法不能鼓励武器创新,无关无关,杀。
回头看A,原文说这个计费系统的好,因此weaken就是说出它的不足,A正确。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-21 03:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部