ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9306|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]gwd28-3-6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-2-22 14:20:00 | 显示全部楼层
主要是第二题问那个关于实验的是对的,偶还是觉得A好。第三段里说:Even when demonstrator hens reacted with obvious disgust to a specific food, via vigorous head shaking and bill wiping, there was no evidence that observers subsequently avoided eating that food. 这里直接说明鸡对讨厌的食物是会有强烈反应的。,而且没有证据表明其他鸡也学会了避开这些食物
A: Only a small number of observer hens appeared to learn to avoid food that was demonstrated by other hens to be noxious。 反过来想,如果有很多鸡都避开讨厌的食物,那就说明鸡是可以学会避开讨厌的食物的,和文中的结论显然不符。正因为只有少数鸡不吃这类食物,才说明证据不足啊
E. Demonstrator hens altered their behavior less obviously in response to noxious foods than in response to highly palatable foods。文中只提到鸡对讨厌食物的反应。再提到对可口食物的反应时,只是说“react favorably ”,丝毫没有提到反应的程度。所以不能说鸡对可口食物的反应要更明显。
所以偶选A.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-1 07:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部