ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: mickyma
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 10 25-28 就是机经里印第安人用水权的文章,大家讨论一下

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-19 15:23:00 | 显示全部楼层

Q25:

The author cites the fact that the Rio Grande pueblos were never formally withdrawn from public lands primarily in order to do which of the following?

A. Suggest why it might have been argued that the Winters doctrine ought not to

apply to pueblo lands

B. Imply that the United States never really acquired sovereignty over pueblo lands

C. Argue that the pueblo lands ought still to be considered part of federal public

lands

D. Support the argument that the water rights of citizens other than American Indians are limited by the Winters doctrine (??)
            

E. Suggest that federal courts cannot claim jurisdiction over cases disputing the

traditional diversion and use of water by Pueblo Indians (??)
            

Answer: A

此題前人已有精彩討論,Ans A也沒有問題了..
    

但有沒有人可以把 選項D及E的句意大致翻譯一下,看得好繞....暈..
    

謝謝先.
    

 

沙发
发表于 2006-6-27 19:06:00 | 显示全部楼层
ding.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-21 05:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部