第一宗罪:无因果联系 The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第七宗罪 gratuitous assumption The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility 作者: xinxinzai 时间: 2014-5-9 22:32
我也是这么觉得的...有没有人能解释呀~~~作者: rainkle 时间: 2014-5-11 22:50
同感~~不太明白作者: Aislingling 时间: 2014-5-30 15:36
个人见解,错误地方请指正~ ><: 我觉得无因果联系是针对已经发生的现象来寻找原因,(就像CR里面的果因论证方式),该现象有可能几个原因导致,不一定是论证中那一个导致的。所以攻击点是用他因来削弱该论证。而说明中要排除的 other possible causal explanations 是指其他可能存在的原因,只有排除了其他可能的原因才能证明就是该原因导致了结果发生。 而无端假设(CR中的因果论证方式),先是阐明了原因,而该因可能无法导致那个结果,也有可能是跟别的原因一起作用才能导致该结果,所以寻找他因也是削弱的一种方式。 综上,二者的推理方向是不同的。 (ps:GMAT一战都没有过的人在这里献丑了.......)作者: vicky525 时间: 2014-8-8 16:06
现有同样疑问。楼主搞懂了么?作者: jessicccca 时间: 2014-8-12 17:26