做逻辑做得很不顺，难道OG是越到后面越难，觉得好多非要看答案才明白。。。这个我是看了还不明白！！
102. Theater critic: The play La Finestrina, now at the Central Theater, was written in Italy in the 18th century.The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the 20th century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in 16th century Italy.
The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
D. the performance of the actor who plays Harle quin in La Finestrna does not serve as evidence against the director's claim
答案就是这个D选项了,我不明白既然这个演员的表演是和另一个具有从意大利16世纪开始出现的表演传统的演员有相同的风格，那就是说这个演员也是意大利16世纪的那种风格啊，而导演说的是这出戏已经是现在戏剧里最接近原作的，而原作是产生于18世纪，难道说从16世纪开始的表演传统是和18世纪一样的吗？所以不能用作反对导演的话，我觉得这么明显的时间不一样，明显是说导演说的那句话应该被反驳吧，真是不懂！
-- by 会员 luciole (2010/4/14 22:18:08)
我也觉得答案解释的很牵强，我自己的理解是导演说这个play最大程度上忠实了18世纪原著。虽然演H的演员的表演会让人想起GM,一个20世纪的喜剧演员（这里是一个evidence against the director's claim,因为20世纪说明不similar to the original production),但是最后又转折了，说M的喜剧风格实际上16世纪就出现了（也就是说确实是similar to the original production，所以这个表演并不能作为反驳导演的证据)
但是唯一想不通的是为什么要拿16世纪来和18世纪作比较
-- by 会员 iamyaoyao (2010/4/15 17:14:12)
个人觉得是这样的：
1.导演说：尽量按传统版本演了
2.评论家说：演员虽然是按照20世纪的一个演员的方式去演的，但是该演员的风格是16世纪的（隐含意思应该是演员们的表演风格是古老的）
所以应该支持导演的观点
所以演员的表演不能作为反对导演说法的证据（若演员风格是近代的才能反对导演的说法）
-- by 会员 sure1301 (2010/4/16 23:56:24)
题目的意思是说题目中的consideration可以作为以下哪个argument的一部分。既然题目中的都是相关性了，所以就不能用作批驳导演的理由了。
做逻辑做得很不顺，难道OG是越到后面越难，觉得好多非要看答案才明白。。。这个我是看了还不明白！！
102. Theater critic: The play La Finestrina, now at the Central Theater, was written in Italy in the 18th century.The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the 20th century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in 16th century Italy.
The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
D. the performance of the actor who plays Harle quin in La Finestrna does not serve as evidence against the director's claim
答案就是这个D选项了,我不明白既然这个演员的表演是和另一个具有从意大利16世纪开始出现的表演传统的演员有相同的风格，那就是说这个演员也是意大利16世纪的那种风格啊，而导演说的是这出戏已经是现在戏剧里最接近原作的，而原作是产生于18世纪，难道说从16世纪开始的表演传统是和18世纪一样的吗？所以不能用作反对导演的话，我觉得这么明显的时间不一样，明显是说导演说的那句话应该被反驳吧，真是不懂！
-- by 会员 luciole (2010/4/14 22:18:08)
-- by 会员 iceberg07 (2010/4/14 23:03:19)
题目的意思是说题目中的consideration可以作为以下哪个argument的一部分。既然题目中的都是相关性了，所以就不能用作批驳导演的理由了。
做逻辑做得很不顺，难道OG是越到后面越难，觉得好多非要看答案才明白。。。这个我是看了还不明白！！
102. Theater critic: The play La Finestrina, now at the Central Theater, was written in Italy in the 18th century.The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the 20th century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in 16th century Italy.
The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
D. the performance of the actor who plays Harle quin in La Finestrna does not serve as evidence against the director's claim
答案就是这个D选项了,我不明白既然这个演员的表演是和另一个具有从意大利16世纪开始出现的表演传统的演员有相同的风格，那就是说这个演员也是意大利16世纪的那种风格啊，而导演说的是这出戏已经是现在戏剧里最接近原作的，而原作是产生于18世纪，难道说从16世纪开始的表演传统是和18世纪一样的吗？所以不能用作反对导演的话，我觉得这么明显的时间不一样，明显是说导演说的那句话应该被反驳吧，真是不懂！
-- by 会员 luciole (2010/4/14 22:18:08)
-- by 会员 iceberg07 (2010/4/14 23:03:19)
错了啊，注意是considerations given，用了复数，说明是问以下这些considerations种哪个可以作为原文argument(即
that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.）的一部分。
-- by 会员 cynthia628 (2011/7/27 11:26:21)
