Two modes of argumentation (两种模式,很可能是对比) have been used on
behalf of women’s emancipation in Western societies.
Arguments in what could be called the “relational” (名词提炼为RF或R)
feminist tradition maintain the doctrine of “equality in
(5) difference,” (R的主要观点,如果不明白,在后面找详细解释)or equity as distinct for equality. They
posit that biological distinctions between the sexesresult in a necessary sexual division of labor (读到这里就可以了,灰色部分可暂时略读)in the
family and throughout society and that women’s pro-
creative labor is currently undervalued by society, to
(10) the disadvantage of women. By contrast(进一步说明文章在对比这两种模式), the individualist feminist (名词首字母提炼为IF或I) tradition emphasizes individual human rights
and celebrates women’s quest for personal autonomy,
while downplaying the importance of gender roles (I的主要观点,可能有题要比较R和I的不同观点)and
minimizing discussion of childbearing and its attendant
(15) responsibilities.
Before (时间状语引出‘对比’,出题点) the late nineteenth century, these views
coexisted within the feminist movement, often within
the writings of the same individual. Between 1890 and
1920, however(强转折,出题点,取非题), relational feminism, which had been the
(20) dominant(过去时态――到1890年之前均dominant+) strain in feminist thought, and which still pre-
dominates among European and non-Western feminists,
lost ground(一般过去时,1890-1920年间不流行-) in England and the United States. Because(强因果,出题点)
the concept of individual rights was already well estab-
lished in the Anglo-Saxon legal and political tradition,
(25) individualist feminism came to predominate in English-
speaking countries. At the same time, the goals of the
two approaches began to seem (并非真的相冲突) increasingly irreconcilable.
Individualist feminists began to advocate a totally
gender-blind (-带负评价的自由褒贬词) system with equal rights for all. Relational
(30) feminists, while agreeing that equal educational and
economic opportunities (R与I的共通处,出题点)outside the home should be avail-
able for all women, continued to emphasize women’s
special contributions to society as homemakers and
mothers; they demanded special treatment
(35) including protective legislation for women workers,
state-sponsored maternity benefits, and paid compensa-
tion for housework.
Relational arguments have a major pitfall(讲R的缺陷): because(特殊符号冒号、because强因果同时出现,很可能有题,缺陷所在)
they underline women’s physiological and psychological
(40) distinctiveness, they are often appropriated by political
adversaries and used to endorse male privilege (缺陷所在). But (强转折) the
individualist approach, by attacking gender roles, deny-
ing the significance of physiological difference, and
condemning existing familial institutions as hopelessly
(45) patriarchal, has often simply treated as irrelevant (I也有不妥) the
family roles important to many women. If the individu-
alist framework, with its claim for women’s autonomy,
could be harmonized with the family-oriented concerns
of relational feminists, a more fruitful model for con-
(50) temporary feminist politics could emerge.(作者评价,两模式各有优缺点,最好能取长补短,注意虚拟语态,很可能出题)
|