急问AAB5,后天上考场了，没有人问过这题

The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:
“The tragic crash of a medical helicopter last week points up a situation that needs to be addressed. The medicalhelicopter
industry supposedly has more stringent guidelines for training pilots and maintaining equipment than do
most other airline industries, but these guidelines do not appear to be working: statistics reveal that the rate of
medical-helicopter accidents is much higher than the rate of accidents for nonmedical helicopters or commercial
airliners.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.

除了怀疑

1)那个surposedly和statistics的地方可信赖程度有待商榷

2)fallacious analogy between medical helicopters and nonmedical helicopters or commercial airliners

还有什么问题啊？？想不出来噻~~~~

1。统计数据问题，也许医疗直升机本身更吸引目光，而其他的很多事故未报道什么的。

2。也许事故发生率已经降低了，但仍高于其他行业，这不能说明guideline有问题。

3。也许是飞机太破或者运输医疗器械的内在风险导致的，就是说本身就容易出事故，这些不可避免的acc并不是guideline试图控制的。