ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2510|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山3-Q4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-5 01:10:00 | 只看该作者

天山3-Q4

Q4 to Q6:
In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries,
many Western Pueblo settlements
in what is now the southwestern United
Line States may have possessed distinctly
(5) hierarchical organizational structures.
These communities’ agricultural
systems—which were “intensive” in
the use of labor rather than “extensive”
in area—may have given rise to polit-
(10) ical leadership that managed both
labor and food resources. That formal
management of food resources
was needed is suggested by the
large size of storage spaces located
(15) around some communal Great Kivas
(underground ceremonial chambers).
Though no direct evidence exists that
such spaces were used to store food,
Western Pueblo communities lacking
(20) sufficient arable land to support their
populations could have preserved
the necessary extra food, including
imported foodstuffs, in such apparently
communal spaces.
(25) Moreover, evidence of specialization
in producing raw materials and
in manufacturing ceramics and textiles
indicates differentiation of labor within
and between communities. The orga-
(30) nizational and managerial demands
of such specialization strengthen
the possibility that a decision-making
elite existed, an elite whose control


over labor, the use of community sur-
(35) pluses, and the acquisition of imported
goods would have led to a concentration
of economic resources in their
own hands. Evidence for differential
distribution of wealth is found in buri-
(40) als of the period: some include large
quantities of pottery, jewelry, and other
artifacts, whereas others from the
same sites lack any such materials.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q4:
Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine the author’s statement in
the last sentence of the passage (lines 38-43) regarding the distribution of wealth in
Western Pueblo settlements?
A. Only community members of exceptional wealth are likely to have been buried
with their personal possessions.
B. Members of communities with extensive agricultural systems are usually buried
without personal possessions.
C. Most artifacts found in burial sites were manufactured locally rather than
imported from other communities.
D. Burial artifacts are often ritual objects associated with religious practices rather
than being the deceased’s personal possessions.
E. The quality of burial artifacts varies depending on the site with which they are
associated.


虽然版规规定不允许重复发帖,但总感觉在原有链接上继续跟帖似乎不足以引起大家注意,所以还是“违例”发个新帖,请斑竹多多包涵哈。。。


这题感觉怪怪的,模考时由于时间紧张,没认真看题,在A、B 之间艰难抉择了半天,下来才发现D才是最完美的答案。


我认为本题A、B是一个性质的选项,如果一个入选另一个也应该正确,因为它们的方法都是提出在原文中无根据的具体某类人的例子来weaken结论,而D才是真正全面地阐述,不知这种理解对否,望不吝赐教。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-5 1:10:49编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-9 22:49:00 | 只看该作者
up...up...up
板凳
发表于 2005-7-10 22:38:00 | 只看该作者

总感觉在原有链接上继续跟帖似乎不足以引起大家注意


我也感觉如此。但这不能构成重复发贴的理由。因为:1、一般,重复发贴不便加入链接,后来的其他XDJM可能看不到此帖。对他们是不利的。2、不方便将你的意见和其他人的意见进行综合比较。所以,能够理解,但还是不提倡了。^_^


本题A、B是一个性质的选项,如果一个入选另一个也应该正确,因为它们的方法都是提出在原文中无根据的具体某类人的例子来weaken结论,


没有这种感觉。尤其是这两个选项还是有显著区别的。当然,其共同点在于即便如其所述,也均不能构成有效的削弱,而且基本偏向于加强或无关了。


我选D


其实,我的对选项的上述意见不一定正确。我想,前人之述备矣,下面的主要工作就是要自己开动脑筋进行思考并做出自己的判断了。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-19 13:49:07编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-7-11 11:19:00 | 只看该作者

一般过于绝对的选项都不会是正确答案,由于only的存在,我直接就把A给否定了。大家给点建议,这种做法是否可行??

5#
发表于 2005-7-11 11:25:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用三脚猫在2005-7-11 11:19:00的发言:

一般过于绝对的选项都不会是正确答案,由于only的存在,我直接就把A给否定了。大家给点建议,这种做法是否可行??



还是慎重点好。如果用来区分最后两个选项还可以。


虽然现在遇到的基本上是绝对词都不太对,但谁知道ETS那老鬼穷途末路会搞出什么东东呢?

6#
发表于 2005-7-11 21:20:00 | 只看该作者

嘿嘿,那到也是


7#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-12 08:47:00 | 只看该作者

我也感觉如此。但这不能构成重复发贴的理由。因为:1、一般,重复发贴不便加入链接,后来的其他XDJM可能看不到此帖。对他们是不利的。2、不方便将你的意见和其他人的意见进行综合比较。所以,能够理解,但还是不提倡了。^_^



8#
发表于 2007-12-5 20:32:00 | 只看该作者

D很充分吗?不是私人财产而是宗教相关的东西,那为什么仍然有差别对待呢。。。

我选C

to be discussed


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-12-5 20:34:49编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-18 20:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部