请教 og-153

ecsniffer · 发表于 2004-2-14 00:31:00

153、Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade.However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power(that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.
Which of the following,if true,does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.
B)The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occured despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.
C)Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired,power plants.
D)Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear,rather than oil-fired,power plants.
E)When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable.
The key:C. Why not A? Please!

dorbear · 发表于 2004-2-15 11:40:00

The cost of the oil does not always positively related to its price about which the argument is talking.

盈盈绿茶 · 发表于 2004-2-21 10:50:00

(that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants)

请问，括号内的内容如何理解呢？

boxxzzy · 发表于 2004-2-21 11:28:00

以下是引用盈盈绿茶在2004-2-21 10:50:00的发言：
(that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants)

请问，括号内的内容如何理解呢？

一个太阳能发电提升的最高极限价格————仍然比new oil-fired power plants所发的电经济的价格。

cranberry · 发表于 2004-2-21 15:34:00

油价只是构成火电厂成本的一部分，A只说了油价，而C说了提高了效率，降低了成本

dydingding · 发表于 2004-3-5 14:37:00

153、Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade.However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power(that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

什么意思：技术的进步和设备成本的降低使得太阳能转化为电更加节约成本，然而，太阳能技术的经济性（为了使新太阳能工厂比新燃油工厂更加经济，每桶油价的价格必须上涨的价格）没有变化，还是35元。

题目问：为什么太能能源的成本下降没有使（要求油价上涨的）价格下降

是这个意思吗？

雪落无声 · 发表于 2004-3-5 18:47:00

economic viability for solar power(that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants)

economic viability用比例的话怎么表示？当时看得时候也晕菜了~小飞，你的解释我还是不太懂，我觉得这个economic viability是个比例，that is 是解释，但是我还是没弄明白是个怎么样的比例

weiyu · 发表于 2004-3-6 00:29:00

First of all, threshold in Chinese means 阈值，比如水的沸点为100, 则100称为水沸的阈值。原文(that is　只有提高每桶原油一定的价格（OP）才能保证太阳能发电比原油发电更经济 )是对太阳能经济阈值的解释。想一想，太阳能发电都随科技的发展变得便宜了，为什么每桶原油还要涨35美元才能保证太阳能发电比原油发电更经济呢，只有一点，那就是原油发电效率也提高了。

LES · 发表于 2004-6-17 18:47:00

看了很对前辈的讨论，可是偶还是对that is引导的解释不得要领。大家的解释似乎都是一个增长量的概念，而偶的理解偏偏是增加到的一个值。下面是偶的翻译，请大家告诉我到底哪里出了问题。谢谢！

that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants.

对黑体部分的语法理解是
in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants, oil would have to rise to the price per barrel.

对整句的翻译是
也就是说，为了使新的太阳能发电厂比新的以石油为燃料的发电厂更经济，石油必须涨到的每桶价格。

chwayne · 发表于 2004-6-17 22:08:00

LES, 你的理解是对的.

如果对国际油价有概念的话，很多年了，国际油价正常情况下每桶基本都低于USD35，多在20－30之间徘徊，that is, 说的当然是oil要涨到solar power经济可行的threshold，the price per barrel USD35 。但好像理解成要涨USD35，也不影响解题。

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2008E1-CR-82 (TUMZ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

请教 og-153

请教 og-153

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()