ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3673|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-Ⅱ-16 以查 人傻智商低

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-15 22:11:00 | 只看该作者

大全-Ⅱ-16 以查 人傻智商低

大全--16.  Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, investigators should find out why the error was made by analyzing airplane design, airline management, and pilot-training programs. For only then can changes be made to ensure that the same type of error does not recur and cause another accident.

Which of the following is a presupposition of the argument above?

(A) Pilot error is not a contributing factor in most airline accidents.

(B) Airline companies themselves should be the agents who investigate airline accidents.

(C) Stricter government regulation of airline companies will make air travel significantly safer.

(D) Investigators of airline accidents should contribute to the prevention of future accidents.D

(E) Most pilots who make errors in flying will repeat their errors unless they are retrained.

我选a ~~~~~~~~~

恨死自己了

沙发
发表于 2006-7-16 03:58:00 | 只看该作者

(A) Pilot error is not a contributing factor in most airline accidents

A is wrong b/c pilot error is in fact the factor, but the argument says that this factor can be caused by other factors such as design, training, etc.

D is right b/c the argument says that only  the investigators can do something to make sure that the same type of error does not recur and cause another accident.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-16 18:11:00 | 只看该作者
也就是说
这道题上来说pilots 就是干扰的?
然后说检查design  接着就跳过去了说 检查完后就安全了
我们就是要架个桥?
谢谢
地板
发表于 2006-10-16 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
为什么A不对啊?
5#
发表于 2006-10-16 13:54:00 | 只看该作者

  这道题目当初我也做错了

到现在还不是很理解

6#
发表于 2006-10-16 14:22:00 | 只看该作者
据个简单的例子 :小胖(一个小学生 假设小学生一般早上都要让家长叫起来)上课总迟到   老师应该去问问他的家长为什么早上不及时叫他起床
7#
发表于 2006-10-17 09:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用eddienumb在2006-10-16 14:22:00的发言:
据个简单的例子 :小胖(一个小学生 假设小学生一般早上都要让家长叫起来)上课总迟到   老师应该去问问他的家长为什么早上不及时叫他起床

什么意思

8#
发表于 2006-10-17 10:36:00 | 只看该作者

Why E is wrong? I think E --Most pilots who make errors in flying will repeat their errors unless they are retrained--- is also a part of presupposition, because the conclusion mentions the pilot training issue "investigators should find out why the error was made by analyzing airplane design, airline management, and pilot-training programs. "

Although I think D is better--investigators supervise the three factors may contributed to future accidents, I will chose E--comprise one factor triggering future accidents-- if D is not an option.

Please advise.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-17 10:38:15编辑过]
9#
发表于 2006-10-17 21:25:00 | 只看该作者

a错的原因是:

 ilot error is not a contrubuting factor in most airline accidents

假设题取非削弱结论

将它取非,不一定削弱原来的结论(同样事故不再发生并导致另外错误的), 现取非如下:

如果Pilot error is  a contrubute factor in most airline accidents,这句话意味着可能还有其它部分因素导致事故,就不一定削弱原文的结论

如果这句话改为Pilot error is not the only contrubuting factor in all airline accidents,就会是答案了

E错的原因同样是most pilots who make............中"most"t的的错误,

大多数飞行员不会重复错误,意味着小部分还是可能会重犯错误的,

那么就反对不了结论(同样事故不再发生并导致另外错误的), 

如果是ALL,的话就会是答案

而且最主要的是D中investigators should contribute to accidents架了一座很好的桥, 如果investigators 没有用,

就不会出现(for only then can changes to ensure error not recure),那么就直接削弱结论

for only then是个很关键的一段话


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-17 21:44:07编辑过]
10#
发表于 2006-10-17 22:13:00 | 只看该作者

感谢!

for only then 的确非常重要

明了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-30 13:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部