ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6404|回复: 19
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-4-7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-1 09:56:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-4-7

Q7:Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long.  In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

  1. Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.
  2. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.

  3. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
  4. Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.
  5. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.

答案B,谁帮我分解一下?

沙发
发表于 2006-7-1 20:52:00 | 只看该作者

尽管Goreville’s central shopping district 的一些打折商店可能会因为在SpendLess discount department store的开业而在5年内关门,但是这个地方不会留有空白。-----要表达的意思是,同类的商店之间的竞争是惨烈的,一般不是你死就是我亡。

Colson’s, a nondiscount department store,一个非打折商店开门了,作者也认为,一个开业的商店都竞争不过Colson’s,都会关门

问weaken

选一个,商店不会关门的就好

B:开业的是打折商店,刚好和Colson’s错位,非同类商店的竞争。不如此惨烈,不会关门

板凳
发表于 2006-7-7 05:41:00 | 只看该作者
why "E" is incorrect?


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-7 5:43:10编辑过]
地板
发表于 2006-8-4 19:48:00 | 只看该作者

我也想知道E错在哪了。

5#
发表于 2006-8-5 01:17:00 | 只看该作者

The conclusion is those locations will not stay vacant for long.

The reason is that the locations will take up by new nondiscount department.

B said that the locations have taken up by discount department, weaken the reason.

directly said the reason can not exit.

but E said that there are stores can sell somethings other than the two competitive stores.

Seem that it is irrelevant to the conclusion and reason.

To be discussed

6#
发表于 2006-8-14 13:34:00 | 只看该作者

1.G的折扣店拼不过“SpendLess discount department store ”,倒闭;但是这些地方不会久久空着

2.拼不过C的非折扣店的location,新店开(has been-完成时态-已经开了的)

结论:those locations will not stay vacant for long

支持结论的:第2句话

问削弱下

B:2句中提到的新店,多是discount店

这下就完了,两种类型的店在G都无立足之地:1句---discount的拼不过Spendless;2句---nondiscount拼不过C

断了those locations 的出路,weaken结论

7#
发表于 2006-10-3 12:25:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得是E中的“many”是导致了错误。

总算看明白了这道题

8#
发表于 2006-10-17 14:53:00 | 只看该作者

...

9#
发表于 2007-4-4 22:41:00 | 只看该作者

认同五楼的观点,第一句是结论而非第二句。我可算看懂啦 多谢!

10#
发表于 2008-9-28 22:27:00 | 只看该作者
In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.


这句话怎么读都读不通,哪位给说说情况?谢谢先@!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 23:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部