ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (OGYM)

00:00:00

Networks of blood vessels in bats' wings serve only to disperse heat generated in flight. This heat is generated only because bats flap their wings. Thus paleontologists' recent discovery that the winged dinosaur Sandactylus had similar networks of blood vessels in the skin of its wings provides evidence for the hypothesis that Sandactylus flew by flapping its wings, not just by gliding.

The argument in the passage relies on which of the following assumptions?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2279|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG(11)-89

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-29 00:43:00 | 只看该作者

OG(11)-89

OG(11)-89

Networks of blood vessels in bats' wings serve only to
disperse heat generated in flight. This heat is generated only because
bats flap their wings. Thus paleontologists' recent discovery that the
winged dinosaur Sandactylus had similar networks of blood vessels in
the skin of its wings provides evidence for the hypothesis that
Sandactylus flew by flapping its wings, not just by gliding.

The argument in the passage relies on which of the following assumptions?
(A)
Sandactylus would not have had networks of blood vessels in the skin of
its wings if these networks were of no use to Sandactylus.
(B) All creatures that fly by flapping their wings have networks of blood vessels in the skin of their wings.
(C)
Winged dinosaurs that flapped their wings in flight would have been
able to fly more effectively than winged dinosaurs that could only
glide.
(D) If Sandactylus flew by flapping its wings, then
paleontologists would certainly be able to find some evidence that it
did so.
(E)Heat generated by Sandactylus in flapping its wings in
flight could not have been dispersed by anything other than the blood
vessels in its wings.


答案是(A)



想请教为什么(B)不是答案呢?
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-29 22:38:19编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-12-29 14:21:00 | 只看该作者
把A取非发现削弱S也靠翅膀飞的结论.

把B取非对结论没有影响, 因为B说反了: 应该是所有用翅膀飞的生物都有ne t wo r k s ..., 而不是所有有ne t wo r k s ...都用翅膀飞.

ri g h t ?

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-12-29 22:54:00 | 只看该作者


谢谢回答喔





可是 (B) 不就是: 用翅膀飞的生物都有 network吗?



All creatures
that fly by flapping their wings have networks of blood vessels in the skin of
their wings.



你的意思是说  (B) 不是个充分必要的条件:用飞的生物都有network;但是有network的生物不见得都飞,是这个意思吗?  






地板
发表于 2005-12-30 12:30:00 | 只看该作者
so r r y , 我没说清楚, 冒号后面是B的错误.

不过你理解得很对, 就是B把充分和必要等同了. 所以取非之后起不到削弱作用.

"用飞的生物都有network;但是有network的生物不见得都飞", 就是这个意思, 一下点出了B的错误.

go o d !

5#
发表于 2006-1-1 00:11:00 | 只看该作者

同意seasnow的解释。


把A中的not去掉,就变成Sandactylus would have had networks of blood vessels in the skin of
its wings if these networks were of no use to Sandactylus.削弱结论。加上not就是支持。


B选项犯了AA里面的错误,after sth and therefore because of sth。因果倒置了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 00:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部