ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12517|回复: 29
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og198,og200-两道than 补充句子的题目

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-22 23:49:00 | 只看该作者

og198,og200-两道than 补充句子的题目


OG198


这道OG 198,如何还原than后省略的句子??虽然答案说了为什么不选ABCD的理由,可是最有问题的就是E如何将than后面省略的句型补出 。


. Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.



(E)for any previous campaign


OG200的E虽然是错误的,than 的比较级前后对比正确吗??记得好像说过those 必须加of 修饰,但是这里没有of 好像也正确


The finding of much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in those that are free of such chemicals suggests one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place.

沙发
发表于 2004-6-23 01:50:00 | 只看该作者

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.

those of是所有格关系,这里的those that是定语修饰

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-23 19:18:00 | 只看该作者
感谢NN
地板
发表于 2005-5-30 18:13:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rt316在2004-6-23 1:50:00的发言:

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.


those of是所有格关系,这里的those that是定语修饰


不同意。省略部分我觉得是Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than it had had for any previous campain…………

由此引出,既然时态不同为什么可以省略呢?

5#
发表于 2005-5-31 16:34:00 | 只看该作者

我愛歐洲:



省略部分我觉得是Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than it had had for any previous campain…………

由此引出,既然时态不同为什么可以省略呢?



我比較不同意,因為,這題是supplies和supplies的比較,所以,rt316說得對,還原後變成:



Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.



最多你可以說,......more supplies than supplies (that it had gathered) for...


這是省略的情形和og132(students), 187(Americans), 200(populations)的情形較為相似,亦即,名詞在泛稱的情況下可以省略,不會造成誤解。可以再研究、討論!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-31 18:36:17编辑过]
6#
发表于 2005-5-31 17:54:00 | 只看该作者



省略部分我觉得是Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than it had had for any previous campain…………

由此引出,既然时态不同为什么可以省略呢?



有一些不同意见,请继续讨论:


我认为这里的it had had for ...应该是承前省略,省略的动词部分应该与前面的谓语动词一致,即 it had had entered Russia。可是这里要表达的意思是以前的supply与这次的supply之间的比较,补出had had反而好像不能清楚地表达比较对象吧(比较的对象是状语中的主体词而不是主语)?



7#
发表于 2005-5-31 18:36:00 | 只看该作者
同意ring_cheng
8#
发表于 2005-6-8 23:29:00 | 只看该作者
198OG是这样说的啊,从句中要用过去完成时(the verb of that clause will need to be in the past perfect form)所以had entered 省略为had had.
9#
发表于 2005-6-22 17:18:00 | 只看该作者

B 是怎么排除的?



10#
发表于 2005-9-22 11:36:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ring_cheng在2005-5-31 17:54:00的发言:



省略部分我觉得是Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than it had had for any previous campain????lt;/STRONG>

由此引出,既然时态不同为什么可以省略呢?



有一些不同意见,请继续讨论:


我认为这里的it had had for ...应该是承前省略,省略的动词部分应该与前面的谓语动词一致,即 it had had entered Russia。可是这里要表达的意思是以前的supply与这次的supply之间的比较,补出had had反而好像不能清楚地表达比较对象吧(比较的对象是状语中的主体词而不是主语)?


黄线部分的叫什么时态啊?只听说有had entered或had been entered, 哪有had had entered的呀,是我晕了吗?


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-11 23:07:00编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-29 18:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部