ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 17453|回复: 33
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全692题即补充132题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-21 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全692题即补充132题

692.    The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment
正确答案是(C),但是C中的did not reflect似乎把原文的结构改变了,而(d)中的not reflecting 似乎与原文的结构更相近一些,请问(d)为什么错了。
沙发
发表于 2003-12-21 23:05:00 | 只看该作者
原文的目的是想说reflect的逻辑主语是it, 在C的表达中,尽管是改变了原文的结构, 但是它用的"and"前面没有逗号, 又省略主语, 毫无歧异的表明reflect的主语是it. 但是D, 用逗号将reflecting与前面隔开, 就产生了reflecting的逻辑主语是the attorney的嫌疑. 所以D不好.
板凳
发表于 2004-2-6 05:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rabbitbug在2003-12-21 23:05:00的发言:
原文的目的是想说reflect的逻辑主语是it, 在C的表达中,尽管是改变了原文的结构, 但是它用的"and"前面没有逗号, 又省略主语, 毫无歧异的表明reflect的主语是it. 但是D, 用逗号将reflecting与前面隔开, 就产生了reflecting的逻辑主语是the attorney的嫌疑. 所以D不好.


how about A? thanks
地板
发表于 2004-2-6 09:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Snazzy在2004-2-6 5:51:00的发言:

how about A? thanks


with 作定语
5#
发表于 2004-2-9 08:45:00 | 只看该作者
如果是A,句子意思为:Affirmative action的配额没有少数民族的雇佣和最终的提升,但根据意思,该性质应该是Offer of position所拥有的.所以A,B,D,E错,这些选项中均修饰了affirmative action
6#
发表于 2004-2-9 09:06:00 | 只看该作者
commitment的逻辑主语应该是it,也就是law firm,
答案c应该是最没有歧义的
A的感觉是commitment的逻辑主语成quota了,
7#
发表于 2004-3-25 02:11:00 | 只看该作者
with短语前无逗号,做定语优先修前面的名词。


另,提请注意:The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion.


it was meant merely to fill      只意味着充数。。。按常理上说应该是:it meant merely to fill,


但朗文上有:


be meant to do something
a) if you are meant to do something, you should do it, especially because someone has told you to or because you are responsible for it
Come on, Ellen, you're meant to be helping me. I thought the police were meant to protect people.
b) to be intended to do something
The diagram is meant to show the different stages of the process.



这些企业应该是:be intended to    fill an affirmative action quota . 而不是:are responsible for an affirmative action quota

8#
发表于 2004-6-30 09:54:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用JerryGuan在2004-3-25 2:11:00的发言:
with短语前无逗号,做定语优先修前面的名词。
另,提请注意:The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion.
it was meant merely to fill   只意味着充数。。。按常理上说应该是:it meant merely to fill,
但朗文上有:
be meant to do something
a) if you are meant to do something, you should do it, especially because someone has told you to or because you are responsible for it
Come on, Ellen, you're meant to be helping me. I thought the police were meant to protect people.
b) to be intended to do something
The diagram is meant to show the different stages of the process.

这些企业应该是:be intended to fill an affirmative action quota . 而不是:are responsible for an affirmative action quota

在看到下题的OG解释时,突然想起jerryguan上面说的这句话(被highlight的部分),不知道和下面OG解释的是否有冲突?

The Baldrick Manufacturing Company has for several years followed a policy aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving the efficiency of its distribution system.


(A) aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving


(B) aimed at the decreasing of operating costs and to improve


(C) aiming at the decreasing of operating costs and improving


(D) the aim of which is the decreasing of operating costs and improvingA


(E) with the aim to decrease operating costs and to improve


The best choice, A, offers an adjective phrase (aimed at 是形容词短语,不是动词过去分词) unequivocally modifying policy and exhibiting grammatical parallelism (decreasing... and improving). In choice B, the gerund the decreasing is not grammatically parallel with the infinitive to improve. Likewise, in C and D, the decreasing of... costs is not parallel with improving the efficiency. In E, the infinitives to decrease and to improve, while parallel, are less idiomatic than the prepositional phrase of decreasing... and improving in modifying the noun aim. Also, with the aim... improve can easily be construed as referring to the Baldrick Manufacturing Company and so does not refer unequivocally to policy.


9#
发表于 2005-2-26 19:54:00 | 只看该作者

各位,以下是为什么选C而非A的一家之言:

A中with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting和c中 and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting 的逻辑主语都是it, 也就是offer, 但a不平行,因为promote 本身有名词形式,promotion, 因此and 连接的不是两个并列形式,不如c好。c有一些罗嗦,但对称完美。

为什么with短语的逻辑主语是it,见以下例子:

The minister received the bad news with great patience.

She cooperate with her team members with great dedication.

10#
发表于 2005-5-4 02:26:00 | 只看该作者

也就是说with短语的逻辑主语应该与with短语之前紧接的句子的主语保持一致

JerryGuan的观点确实需要商榷的说

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-14 03:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部