ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 13348|回复: 46
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创]逻辑Boldface练习题-04投票

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-5 08:24:00 | 只看该作者

[原创]逻辑Boldface练习题-04投票

逻辑Boldface练习题-04投票
沙发
发表于 2003-9-5 09:15:00 | 只看该作者
[face=Times New Roman]4. More and more computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are being produced, and it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles. Consequently, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects.
The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the second-premise that the argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.
(B) The first is the fact that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that must be drawn from this passage.
(C) The first is the part of premise that the argument includes; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(D) The first is the part of evidence that supports this argument; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(E) The first is the first conclusion in this argument; the second is the second conclusion in this argument. [/face]







[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-5 9:17:49编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2003-9-5 12:05:00 | 只看该作者
如果选 C The first is the part of premise that the argument includes,就认为整个第一句话,在 consequecely 这前都是这段argument 的 premise。 

XDJM们认为第一句在and 前后的两个分句到底是什么作用呢?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-5 12:20:00 | 只看该作者
大家认为该如何区分inference和conclusion呢?
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-5 12:21:00 | 只看该作者
我对此很困惑
6#
发表于 2003-9-5 13:04:00 | 只看该作者
inference 只能是是暗含,文中没有直接说明的。

但conclusion 面更大些。大概inference 也是conclusion的一种。

我对这些词也很困惑。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-5 13:19:00 | 只看该作者
feels better
8#
发表于 2003-9-8 11:25:00 | 只看该作者
我认为选E

C是有一点混淆,但是从意思上看黑体部分应该是并列的两个结论。
因为是由于计算机程序能更多的帮助计算工程中的数学问题,所以土木工程的课程可以更多地转向更重要的课题。
It is thus...已经是一个sub-conclusion。

仅仅一家之言


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-8 11:25:39编辑过]
9#
发表于 2003-9-8 11:41:00 | 只看该作者
所谓的second-premise是什么意思呢?
还有inference和conclusion区别是否在于inference只能出现原文范畴内的内容,而conclusion可以有类推到其他呢?








[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-8 11:47:06编辑过]
10#
发表于 2003-9-8 11:52:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用remeo在2003-9-8 11:41:00的发言:
所谓的second-premise是什么意思呢?
  
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-8 11:47:06编辑过]



先把argment 分析一下,哪句话是前提,哪句是结论,如果有两个前提,那第二个就是second premise了。


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-23 22:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部