ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3314|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

AA065

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-31 18:22:00 | 只看该作者

AA065

65.



The following appeared in a memorandum from the vice president of Road Food, an international chain of fast-food restaurants.






“This past year, we spent almost as much on advertising as did our main competitor, Street Eats, which has fewer restaurants than we do. Although it appeared at first that our advertising agency had created a campaign along the lines we suggested, in fact our total profits were lower than those of Street Eats. In order to motivate our advertising agency to perform better, we should start basing the amount that we pay it on how much total profit we make each year.





总利润低是因为广告商工作不好造成的。



竞争者盈利不是因为广告。



any more?

沙发
发表于 2005-5-31 19:37:00 | 只看该作者
文中也提到了该企业的restaurant比竞争对手多自然应该投入更多在广告费用上
板凳
发表于 2005-9-13 13:54:00 | 只看该作者

同意好小孩,练练手,写一下


As the vice president has mentioned, the Rood Food has more restaurants than its main competitor, Street Eats, but its expenses on advertising last year were as much as that of Street Eats. Thus, it is easy to conclude that Rood Food made a lower advertising investment per restaurant than does Street Eats.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-13 13:58:53编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-9-13 20:16:00 | 只看该作者

The profitablility is determined not only by sales but also by the cost. The profitability can not be improved unless the sales outweigh the costs.

5#
发表于 2006-1-4 13:41:00 | 只看该作者

1。给的广告费一样多,不代表效果一样:店多分散效果,广告商水平不一样;


2。效果一样好,不代表收益一样多:收益取决与多方面,原料,员工工资;


3。比SE收益少,不代表经营不好,两者不完全类比。


4。与收益挂钩的广告费未必能刺激广告商,可能反效果。


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 14:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部