|
0九月29号考试，可是还是超时。
AI-92, 92. “Government should establish regulations to reduce or eliminate any suspected health hazards in the environment, even when the scientific studies of these health hazards are incomplete or contradictory.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Some people advocate government to establish regulations to reduce or elimimate any suspected health hazards in the environment, even when the scientific studies of these health hazards are incomplete or contradictory. The opponents hold that government should be prudent to issue the relative regulations relative to this area, especially without convincing scientific evidence. The debate is quite hot and meaningful when people are more concerned about health hazards. In my opinion, government should be prudent in this matter because the regulations will influence fields far beyond the extent of government control and not necessarily meet the government initial desire----protect citizen’s health.
In the first place, when government issue regulations to reduce or elimimate any suspected health hazards in the environment, the relative industries will get great damage, the damage leading to terrible unemployement, financial risks of corporation and even economy depression. For instance, China government think traditional product for festival celebration----fireworks are responsible for the deteriation of air qualification in cities. Thereby the government baned any fireworks production in China. But the regulation has not benefited citizens and relative fields since it was issued. The product relative industries, the main financial resources of the local economy, lost a lot of work opportunities and result in many social problems. The consumers can not find any entertainment and happiness from festival celebration, and thus surpress other expenditures on festival.
In the second place, there are many unprecendented debates in scientific research development today. Any sceitific theory regarded as a truth can be questioned tomorrow for we live in a democratic society. Government can not change its regulations associated with the development of scientfic debates. It should be more prudent to establish relative regulations to reduce or eliminate the suspected health hazards in the environment, especially when the scientific studies of these health hazards are incomplete or contradictory. Given the government always following unwarranted scientific suggestions, the people will be confused about the unconsistent of government regulations and industries will get much more uncontroled risks from government management and give up the investment in the nation at end.
In conclusion, on the basis of the above analysis, I advocate that government should be prudent to issue reguations to reduce or eliminate the suspected health hazards in the environment, even when the scientific studies of these health hazards are incomplete or contradictory.
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-10 16:15:48编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-9-10 10:47:00
