ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4589|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

AI081-请拍转<--sacrati修改标题及文章的题目,望谅

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-7 17:25:00 | 只看该作者

AI081-请拍转<--sacrati修改标题及文章的题目,望谅



81. “No one can possibly achieve any real and lasting success or ‘get rich’ in business by conforming to conventional practices or ways of thinking.”



Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.



It is a controversial issue that people can achieve real and lasting success or 'get rich' in business by conforming to conventional practices or by innovative ways of thinking. People with different backgrounds and experiences hold various opinions. Some people contend that people cannot achieve a great success if he keeps the traditional practices. However, other people assert that people should conform to those conventional practices so as to secure the gradual success. As far as I am concerned, the conclusion should be analyzed case by case.



First, there is no need for people to conform to the conventional ways of thinking in the businesses which require innovation and imagination. A typical example is in the business of advertising. The industry of advertising requires the people to break the traditional ways of thinking so that more ideas can pop up. Without imagination, all the advertisements will illustrate the same story, show the same picture and reach the same conclusion. There will be no attractions of the products.



Second, for some other businesses, it is highly required to conform to the conventional pactices, . For instance, if an accounting firm does not comply with the accounting regulations and help the client to conceal the fraud, the accounting firm will be sued. If a law firm does not conform to the regulations, there will be no standard to judge a crime and therefore will result in the turbulence in the society. If the doctors give up all the medical theories and make an innovation to prescribe some new medicines for patients, the lives of the patient will be greatly threatened.



Admittedly, we should consider a problem from two sides. An advertising company should also have some regulation limits and the professional company could sometime be flexible to deal with some cases only if it is within the range of the regulations.



To sum, it is imprudent and reckless to conclude that people can achieve great success either by innovation or by conformation to the conventional practices. Each coin has two sides. We should analyze the cases from both the positive aspects and negative aspects so as to make a reasonable judgment.





沙发
发表于 2005-9-7 18:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wendybao在2005-9-7 17:25:00的发言:

92. “Government should establish regulations to reduce or eliminate any suspected health hazards in the environment, even when the scientific studies of these health hazards are incomplete or contradictory.”


Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.



It is a controversial issue that people can achieve real and lasting success or 'get rich' in business by conforming to conventional practices or by innovative ways of thinking. People with different backgrounds and experiences hold various opinions. Some people contend that people cannot achieve a great success if he keeps the traditional practices. However, other people assert that people should conform to those conventional practices so as to secure the gradual success. As far as I am concerned, the conclusion should be analyzed case by case.



First, there is no need for people to conform to the conventional ways of thinking in the businesses which require innovation and imagination. A typical example is in the business of advertising. The industry of advertising requires the people to break the traditional ways of thinking so that more ideas can pop up. Without imagination, all the advertisements will illustrate the same story, show the same picture and reach the same conclusion. There will be no attractions of the products.



Second, for some other businesses, it is highly required to conform to the conventional pactices, . For instance, if an accounting firm does not comply with the accounting regulations and help the client to conceal the fraud, the accounting firm will be sued. If a law firm does not conform to the regulations, there will be no standard to judge a crime and therefore will result in the turbulence in the society. If the doctors give up all the medical theories and make an innovation to prescribe some new medicines for patients, the lives of the patient will be greatly threatened.



Admittedly, we should consider a problem from two sides. An advertising company should also have some regulation limits and the professional company could sometime be flexible to deal with some cases only if it is within the range of the regulations.



To sum, it is imprudent and reckless to conclude that people can achieve great success either by innovation or by conformation to the conventional practices. Each coin has two sides. We should analyze the cases from both the positive aspects and negative aspects so as to make a reasonable judgment.





wendybao又来了阿。welcome。以前看到过你的文章,觉得你可以改进的地方,就是字数,但是经过一段时间觉得干嘛字数还是只有359个字呢,还是要争取到400字以上,至少看上去是象高分的。而且lz的开头是字数最多的,还是把重点放在中间三段的写作上把。其他用词什么都很好啊。(不过没仔细看语法)觉得你还是想办法能够在规定时间内多写一点,为好!!!

板凳
发表于 2005-9-7 18:43:00 | 只看该作者

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=26&ID=130174&replyID=&skin=0


这是你以前自己贴的帖子。


既然下面纠正了那这个帖子也要纠正一下
上面的链接是你贴错题号的AI092的


实在是不好意思啊


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-12 17:36:33编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-9-11 20:38:00 | 只看该作者

真的是很细心,相当钦佩 sacrati的敬业,尽管不是 duty。


向你致敬!


但楼主的题目和文章似乎 ???错了吧!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-11 20:42:16编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-9-12 17:12:00 | 只看该作者


81. “No one can possibly achieve any real and lasting success or ‘get rich’ in business by conforming to conventional practices or ways of thinking.”


Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.



太丢人了,看文章的时候怎么就没注意到这茬事情,该检讨一下自己。上面是我对应


找到的题目。埃,下次一定注意。然后也麻烦lz看到的话,把自己的题目和标题改一下!!!


太谢谢zhidong_w了,指出我这么犯了这么一个大错误。下次一定再细心一点!!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 05:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部