AAA10集思广益中参加讨论提高自己惠及他人

A10. The following appeared in a memo from the vice president in charge of fundraising at LACE w:st="on">LACENAME w:st="on">WaymarshLACENAME> LACETYPE w:st="on">UniversityLACETYPE>LACE>:

“Three years ago, as part of a very successful campaign to increase the amount of money donated for scholarships, LACE w:st="on">LACENAME w:st="on">SophiaLACENAME> LACENAME w:st="on">College used student volunteers to telephone selected alumni and request contributions. That year the total amount of money donated to Sophia exceeded its annual goal by 150%. To reduce overhead costs for fundraising and increase contributions, Waymarsh University should begin using student volunteers to make telephone requests in all our fundraising efforts. Furthermore, since the enrollment at Waymarsh University is more than twice that at Sophia College, we should be able to raise at least as much money each year as Sophia did by using this same method.”

1三年前的方法现在不一定适用

2别的学校有效，这个学校不一定有效

3从校友那里募集钱款和从别的渠道是不一样的

4学生数和募集的钱没有关系

谢谢，我已经给你回信息拉

呵呵这个也讨论过了

今天又可以偷懒了

open to discussion

我是考虑了三个逻辑错误：

前两个同楼主的一样，第三个我认为还可以考虑oversimplification，即不一定是这个方法导致了当年捐款的增多，这两者之间只是一个同时发生的关系，没有因果关系。

还有啊，人家学校就说了有一次捐款，这个学校说要each year.

这学校的enrollment是人家的两倍，可毕业学生不一定多啊，还有，人家毕业的学生可能专业不一样，有钱，这个学校的学生没钱。

同意楼上诸层！

大家有没觉得新题的fallacy比较多，也比较细，一说起来容易乱啊？