A25. “Businesses should grant all employees the opportunity to move into management-level positions.” 1一个公司要有vertical flexibility才能调动公司员工的积极性让他们可以更积极地投入工作。因为他们知道好的表现是会得到认同的是有机会被提升的。 2反过来一个缺少了垂直流动性的公司就会变得僵化好得员工不能得到提升不能到发挥他们最大功用的地方去。而员工的士气也会受到很大的影响进而影响到整个公司的效率。 3但是也不是所有的员工都适合去做管理工作的。对于那些技术骨干业务精英可以给他们以除了升职以外的奖励。
I'm not very sure the exact meaning of this issue after reading your outlines. Initially, I thought it was about the fairness of promotion to all employees. But from your outlines, it seems not what I had thought. My outline is as follows.
1/ Granting all employees the opportunity to move into management-level position is the basic obligation that all companies should provide to its employees. Under our social security law, all companies should work against discrimination against sex, race, and religion. ....Moreover, the action of granting fair opportunity is consistent with our democratic ethics of opportunity equality. ...
2/ By providing equal oppotunity of promotion, emlpoyees will feel motivated and deserved of contribution.... In addition, it will help form a homoniousness and collaboration between employees.
3/ It would also contribute to a better reputation for the company. For example, the "Bench Plan" in IBM
This statement is ambiguous. It could mean, literally, that business success depends on knowing more than anyone else about one’s operations, products and markets. Or it could be a subtle recommendation to acquire privileged information, by whatever means, to use for one’s own advantage. I agree with the statement in the first sense. However, I strongly disagree with many implications of the second possible meaning.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-5-28 13:31:00
发表于 2005-5-29 04:01:00
楼主
