ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6950|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Gwd 4-36 求助!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-2 12:49:00 | 只看该作者

Gwd 4-36 求助!!

Q36:


The author mentions the fact that baryons are the source of stars’ luminosity primarily in order to explain


              



  • how astronomers determine that some galaxies contain fewer stars per unit volume than do others

  • how astronomers are able to calculate the total luminosity of a galaxy

  • why astronomers can use galactic luminosity to estimate baryonic mass

  • why astronomers’ estimates of baryonic mass based on galactic luminosity are more reliable than those based on spectroscopic studies of helium

  • how astronomers know bright galaxies contain more baryons than do dim galaxies

  • 答案是C,但我觉得怎么是B呀。。请看原文中内容:


    Baryons—subatomic particles


    (30)      that are generally protons or


    neutrons—are the source of


    stellar, and therefore galactic,


           luminosity, and so their numbers


    can be estimated based on how


    (35)    luminous galaxies are.


    这里是说Baryons是stellar的source,因此通过galaxies的亮度,可以估算出单个galaxy的亮度,因此也就可估算出galaxy的数目。而原文中的therefore正是和题目中的in order to相对应的,答案B中说的正是“单个galaxy的发光度”,而C中说的galaxy的质量,在此处没有提及,是后文推出了。所以,应该选C呀。。请大家帮忙看看,非常感谢。。


    原文附下:


    In addition to conventional


           galaxies, the universe contains


           very dim galaxies that until


    Line       recently went unnoticed by


      (5)      astronomers.  ossibly as


    numerous as conventional gal-


    axies, these galaxies have the


    same general shape and even


    the same approximate number


    (10) of stars as a common type of


    conventional galaxy, the spiral,


    but tend to be much larger.


    Because these galaxies’


    mass is spread out over


    (15)      larger areas, they have far


    fewer stars per unit volume


    than do conventional galaxies.


    Apparently these low-surface-


    brightness galaxies, as they


    (20)      are called, take much longer


           than conventional galaxies to


           condense their primordial gas


    and convert it to stars—that is,


    they evolve much more slowly.


    (25)            These galaxies may


    constitute an answer to the long-


    standing puzzle of the missing


    baryonic mass in the universe.


    Baryons—subatomic particles


    (30)      that are generally protons or


    neutrons—are the source of


    stellar, and therefore galactic,


           luminosity, and so their numbers


    can be estimated based on how


    (35)    luminous galaxies are.  How-


    ever, the amount of helium


    in the universe, as measured


    by spectroscopy, suggests


          that there are far more baryons


    (40)     in the universe than estimates


    based on galactic luminosity


    indicate.  Astronomers have


    long speculated that the missing


    baryonic mass might eventually


    (45)      be discovered in intergalactic


    space or as some large popu-


    lation of galaxies that are difficult


    to detect.

    沙发
    发表于 2005-2-7 23:12:00 | 只看该作者

    你划线的这句话正是为了说明前句话,前句话提到了Baryron的质量不见了,后面接着讲Baryon的数量是在galaxy luminosity的基础上估计的,这个数量是和质量相关的

    板凳
    发表于 2005-5-25 20:46:00 | 只看该作者

    這題我覺得C也有點問題。因為,原文說的是由galaxy的亮度來估計bryons的「數量」(L34-35 their numbers can be estimated based on how luminous galaxies are),但是c答案卻是說太空人可利用亮度來估計baryonic mass(質量)。


    因此,我覺得,答案應該是E。

    地板
    发表于 2005-8-12 22:36:00 | 只看该作者

    其实,说B是S的源头,很直接的是为了说明紧跟在后面的and therefor galactic luminosity,即选项B所述;


    根本上是为了说明为什么可以用光来推测B的质量,即选项C所述。


    这样看来,B和C都说得过去;关键是,B和C的情态动词用的不一样:B说be able to,意即已经能够并很有可能已经付诸实践,而C用了can,仅仅说明有这种能力。回过头来,我们再看文章中的语气,


              These galaxies may


    constitute an answer to the long-


    standing puzzle of the missing


    baryonic mass in the universe.


    Baryons—subatomic particles


    (30)      that are generally protons or


    neutrons—are the source of


    stellar, and therefore galactic,


           luminosity, and so their numbers


    can be estimated based on how


    (35)     luminous galaxies are.  How-


    ever, the amount of helium


    in the universe, as measured


    by spectroscopy, suggests


          that there are far more baryons


    (40)     in the universe than estimates


    based on galactic luminosity


    indicate.  Astronomers have


    long speculated that the missing


    baryonic mass might eventually


    (45)      be discovered in intergalactic


    space or as some large popu-


    lation of galaxies that are difficult


    to detect.


    一段文字,用了这么多表示猜测假想的情态动词或实意动词,很明显,C更符合原文的行文,而B则破坏了这种行文环境。


    所以,C正确,B根本错误。


    ETS很狡猾。。。

    5#
    发表于 2005-8-30 22:04:00 | 只看该作者

    同意楼上的高见


    6#
    发表于 2005-11-9 00:19:00 | 只看该作者
    These galaxies may constitute an answer to the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe. 我認為第二段第一行就已經先解釋它下面要講的東西,在這邊提到的

    Baryons—subatomic particles


    (30)      that are generally protons or


    neutrons—are the source of


    stellar, and therefore galactic,


           luminosity, and so their numbers


    can be estimated based on how


    (35)    luminous galaxies are.  對應下面 Astronomers have


    long speculated that the missing


    baryonic mass might eventually


    (45)      be discovered in intergalactic


    space or as some large popu-


    lation of galaxies that are difficult


    to detect. 所以是解釋為什麼,而不是how  小小淺見...望NN指點...

    7#
    发表于 2007-7-6 17:06:00 | 只看该作者

    Baryons—subatomic particles

    (30) that are generally protons or

    neutrons—are the source of

    stellar, and therefore galactic,

    luminosity, and so their numbers

    can be estimated based on how

    (35)
            
    luminous galaxies are

    文章说根据亮度estimate number所以选C

    8#
    发表于 2007-12-1 11:53:00 | 只看该作者

    Q36:不好意思,我不同意以情态动词为角度的解题思路,因为差别不明显,而且很多人无法精确理解美国人的口吻.

    更明确的角度依然是原文的依据,B错是因为原文说的是galaxies,整个银河星系的亮度,而B悄悄改为a galaxy;而且原文说estimate,B却说calculate,明显不准确。

    而且原文32行有个关键词therefore,前后是因果关系,B是星星的源头,所以它们的数量能够根据银河系的发光度来估计。正好就是答案C。

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 21:56
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部