ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4379|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 3-7 想再问一下下

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-24 10:25:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 3-7 想再问一下下

Q5 to Q7:



      In 1994, a team of scientists led



       by David Mckay began studying the


       meteorite ALH84001, which had been


Line       discovered in Antarctica in 1984.


  (5)      Two years later, the McKay team


announced that ALH84001, which


scientists generally agree originated


on Mars, contained compelling evi-


dence that life once existed on Mars.


(10)      This evidence includes the discovery


of organic molecules in ALH84001,


the first ever found in Martian rock.


Organic molecules—complex, carbon-



based compounds—form the basis for


(15)      terrestrial life.  The organic molecules


found in ALH84001 are polycyclic aro-


matic hydrocarbons, or PAH’s.  When


microbes die, their organic material


often decays into PAH’s.


(20)            Skepticism about the McKay team’s


       claim remains, however.  For example,


       ALH84001 has been on earth for


13,000 years, suggesting to some


scientists that its PAH’s might have


(25)      resulted form terrestrial contamination.


However, McKay’s team has demon-


strated that the concentration of PAH’s


increases as one looks deeper into


ALH84001, contrary to what one would


(30)      expect from terrestrial contamination.


The skeptic’s strongest argument,


however, is that processes unrelated


       to organic life can easily produce all


the evidence found by McKay’ steam,


(35)    including PAH’s.  For example, star


formation produces PAH’s.  Moreover,


PAH’s frequently appear in other


meteorites, and no one attributes


      their presence to life processes.


(40)     Yet McKay’s team notes that the


particular combination of PAH’s


in ALH84001 is more similar to the


combinations produced by decaying


organisms than to those originating


form nonbiological processes.


Q7:


The passage suggests that the fact that ALH84001 has been on earth for 13,000 years has been used by some scientists to support which of the following claims about ALH84001?






  1. ALH84001 may not have originated on Mars.
  2. ALH84001 contains PAH’s that are the result of nonbiological processes.
  3. ALH84001 may not have contained PAH’s when it landed on Earth.
  4. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 are not PAH’s.
  5. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 could not be the result of terrestrial contamination

B 中的nonbiological processes 怎么理解?terrestrial contamination 难道不是可以说是一种nonbiological processes? 求教

沙发
发表于 2004-11-24 14:51:00 | 只看该作者

I chose C.  

Terrestrial contamination may or may not be nonbiological processes. "ALH84001 may not have contained PAH’s when it landed on Earth" as stated in choice C, but it is later contaminated by microbes which died on earth.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-24 15:09:00 | 只看该作者
Clear! Thanks!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 04:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部