gwd4-7?

Many scholars have theorized that

         economic development, particularly

         industrialization and urbanization, con-

Line         tributes to the growth of participatory

  (5)       democracy;  according to this theory, it

would seem logical that women would

both demand and gain suffrage in ever

greater numbers whenever economic

development expanded their economic

(10)       opportunities.  However, the economic

development theory is inadequate to

explain certain historical facts about the

implementation of women’s suffrage.

For example, why was women’s suf-

(15)       frage, instituted nationally in the United

States in 1920, not instituted nationally

in Switzerland until the 1970’s?  Indus-

trialization was well advanced in both

countries by 1920:  over 33 percent

(20)       of American workers were employed

         in various industries, as compared

         to 44 percent of Swiss workers.

Granted, Switzerland and the United

States diverged in the degree to

(25)       which the expansion of industry coin-

cided with the degree of urbanization:

only 29 percent of the Swiss population

lived in cities of 10,000 or more inhabi-

tants by 1920.  However, urbanization

(30)       cannot fully explain women’s suffrage.

Within the United States prior to 1920,

for example, only less urbanized

         states had granted women suffrage.

Similarly, less urbanized countries

(35)          such as Cambodia and Ghana had

voting rights for women long before

Switzerland did.  It is true that Switzer-

land’s urbanized cantons (political

subdivisions) generally enacted

(40)          women’s suffrage legislation earlier

than did rural cantons.  However,

these cantons often shared other

characteristics—similar linguistic back-

grounds and strong leftist parties—that

may help to explain this phenomenon.

Q7:

The passage suggests which of the following about urbanization in Switzerland and the United States by 1920?

A greater percentage of Swiss industrial workers than American industrial workers lived in urban areas.

There were more cities of 10,000 or more inhabitants in Switzerland than there were in the United States.

Swiss workers living in urban areas were more likely to be employed in industry than were American workers living in urban areas.

Urbanized areas of Switzerland were more likely than similar areas in the United States to have strong leftist parties.

A greater percentage of the United States population than the Swiss population lived in urban areas.

the answer is e，但文中只说

          which the expansion of industry coin-

cided with the degree of urbanization:

only 29 percent of the Swiss population

lived in cities of 10,000 or more inhabi-

tants by 1920.

在瑞士，居住在有10000或10000以上居民的城市的人口只有29%，文中并没说10000人以下的不算是城市，也没提供瑞士人居住在人口小于10000城市里的比率。从什么地方可以推出答案中的美国人居住在城里的比率比瑞士大呢？

请指教？

countries by 1920:  over 33 percent

(20)       of American workers were employed

         in various industries, as compared

         to 44 percent of Swiss workers.

这里先说Swiss Industrialization的程度比美国高

Granted, Switzerland and the United

States diverged in the degree to

(25)       which the expansion of industry coin-

cided with the degree of urbanization:美国和瑞士工业化和都市化一致性不同

only 29 percent of the Swiss population

lived in cities of 10,000 or more inhabi-

tants by 1920. （这里表示瑞士的工业化高但都市化却低 所以美国则相反 工业化比瑞士低但都市化相对较高）

请指教 !!

噢，明白了。多谢。

看来对关键句的把握很重要啊，

only 29 percent of the Swiss population

lived in cities of 10,000 or more inhabi-

tants by 1920.只是个例子而已，观点是前一句话。

谢谢bryan0806

我看了以前的帖子，好像没有人说 C 的。

第一点： 工业雇用比率美国33%,而瑞士44%

关键是这句话 diverged
            in the degree to which the expansion of industry coincided with the degree of urbanization

是说  工业化程度与城市化程度的匹配度不同   那么说  只有29%的人住在10,000 or more inhabitants的城市里，就像以前有一个人说的帖子一样，多少人的算 urban， 这里概念不清阿

那为什么不能说 C 可以呢？  在urban的人更容易就业

Swiss workers living in urban areas were more likely to be employed in industry than were American workers living in urban areas.
    

请指教   谢谢

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=25&ID=61615&replyID=&skin=1

看这里，讲的很清楚