ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4389|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-1-37

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-11 22:06:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-1-37

Q35 to Q37:


      In corporate purchasing,


       competitive scrutiny is typically


       limited to suppliers of items that are


Line       directly related to end products.


  (5)       With “indirect” purchases (such as


computers, advertising, and legal


services), which are not directly


related to production, corporations


often favor “supplier partnerships”


(10)      (arrangements in which the


purchaser forgoes the right to


pursue alternative suppliers), which


can inappropriately shelter suppliers


from rigorous competitive scrutiny


(15)      that might afford the purchaser


economic leverage.  There are two


independent variables—availability


of alternatives and ease of changing


suppliers—that companies should


(20)      use to evaluate the feasibility of


       subjecting suppliers of indirect


       purchases to competitive scrutiny.


This can create four possible


situations.


(25)            In Type 1 situations, there are


many alternatives and change is


relatively easy.  Open pursuit of


alternatives—by frequent com-


petitive bidding, if possible—will


(30)      likely yield the best results.  In


Type 2 situations, where there


are many alternatives but change


       is difficult—as for providers of


employee health-care benefits—it


(35)     is important to continuously test


the market and use the results to


secure concessions from existing


suppliers.  Alternatives provide a


      credible threat to suppliers, even if


(40)     the ability to switch is constrained.


In Type 3 situations, there ate few


alternatives, but the ability to switch


without difficulty creates a threat that


companies can use to negotiate


(45)      concessions from existing suppliers.


In Type 4 situations, where there


are few alternatives and change


is difficult, partnerships may be


unavoidable.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q37:


According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?




  • The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny

  • The number of suppliers of the purchased item available to the purchasing company

  • The methods of negotiation that are available to the purchasing company

  • The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product

  • The degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s business operations

  • 答案是E ,可我觉得E更对,请各位指点一下。


    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2004-10-11 22:07:00 | 只看该作者
    不好意思,我是觉得D更对
    板凳
    发表于 2004-10-14 19:07:00 | 只看该作者

    我想你是对的,这题我看过讨论。有人提问过。你可以自己使用“搜索”

    GWD的答案不算完全正确,很多都需要讨论。

    (5)       With “indirect” purchases (such as

    computers, advertising, and legal

    services), which are not directly

    related to production, corporations

    often favor “supplier partnerships”

    (10)      (arrangements in which the

    purchaser forgoes the right to

    pursue alternative suppliers), which

    can inappropriately shelter suppliers

    from rigorous competitive scrutiny

    (15)      that might afford the purchaser

    economic leverage.  

    地板
    发表于 2006-6-5 13:57:00 | 只看该作者
    E是答非所问。。。
    5#
    发表于 2008-4-17 22:33:00 | 只看该作者
    up~
    6#
    发表于 2009-7-16 07:59:00 | 只看该作者
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 04:16
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部