ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 10005|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD3-5,请指教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-14 00:12:00 | 只看该作者

GWD3-5,请指教

In 1994, a team of scientists led


       by David Mckay began studying the


       meteorite ALH84001, which had been


Line       discovered in Antarctica in 1984.


  (5)      Two years later, the McKay team


announced that ALH84001, which


scientists generally agree originated


on Mars, contained compelling evi-


dence that life once existed on Mars.


(10)      This evidence includes the discovery


of organic molecules in ALH84001,


the first ever found in Martian rock.


Organic molecules—complex, carbon-


based compounds—form the basis for


(15)      terrestrial life.  The organic molecules


found in ALH84001 are polycyclic aro-


matic hydrocarbons, or PAH’s.  When


microbes die, their organic material


often decays into PAH’s.


(20)            Skepticism about the McKay team’s


       claim remains, however.  For example,


       ALH84001 has been on earth for


13,000 years, suggesting to some


scientists that its PAH’s might have


(25)      resulted form terrestrial contamination.


However, McKay’s team has demon-


strated that the concentration of PAH’s


increases as one looks deeper into


ALH84001, contrary to what one would


(30)      expect from terrestrial contamination.


The skeptic’s strongest argument,


however, is that processes unrelated


       to organic life can easily produce all


the evidence found by McKay’ steam,


(35)    including PAH’s.  For example, star


formation produces PAH’s.  Moreover,


PAH’s frequently appear in other


meteorites, and no one attributes


      their presence to life processes.


(40)     Yet McKay’s team notes that the


particular combination of PAH’s


in ALH84001 is more similar to the


combinations produced by decaying


organisms than to those originating


form nonbiological processes.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q5:


The passage asserts which of the following about the claim that ALH84001 originated on Mars?


              



  • It was initially proposed by the McKay team of scientists.

  • It is not a matter of widespread scientific dispute.

  • It has been questioned by some skeptics of the McKay team’s work.

  • It has been undermined by recent work on PAH’s.

  • It is incompatible with the face that ALH84001 has been on Earth for 13,000 years.

  • 答案是B,请哪位大侠来给我解释一下B选项的含义啊,到底是说这个事情是个被广泛讨论的,还是个不被广泛讨论的?


    我琢磨了半天,觉得文章说这个事在被广泛讨论,而选项和文章说反了。.所以选了个A...


    我也知道文章真正讨论的其实是PAH的证据有效性。.但是这个PAH不正是为了证明ALH84001 originated on Mars?

    先行谢过
    沙发
    发表于 2004-9-14 18:16:00 | 只看该作者
    是个不被广泛讨论的
    板凳
    发表于 2004-9-14 19:18:00 | 只看该作者
    第7行 “which

    scientists generally agree originated


    on Mars,”


    就是对应这句话

    地板
     楼主| 发表于 2004-9-14 20:44:00 | 只看该作者
    明白了。.谢谢2位
    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-14 20:44:44编辑过]
    5#
    发表于 2005-7-25 09:58:00 | 只看该作者

    dispute


    这个词是关键,含有“争论”的意思。

    6#
    发表于 2006-5-31 00:23:00 | 只看该作者

    not+ dispute(否定含义)=generally agree

    不被争论=通常同意 

    7#
    发表于 2006-11-14 19:58:00 | 只看该作者

    这题理解选项是关键!我一开始也做错了.

    8#
    发表于 2007-10-16 00:08:00 | 只看该作者
    up
    9#
    发表于 2007-11-19 19:34:00 | 只看该作者

    The passage asserts which of the following about the claim that ALH84001 originated on Mars?

    提醒大家注意题目是如何问的

    既然第7行 “which scientists generally agree originated on Mars,”说the claim that ALH84001 originated on Mars   

    是被广泛接受了的观点

    说明关于the claim that ALH84001 originated on Mars已经不是一个widespread scientific dispute(广泛的科学争议)了

    10#
    发表于 2008-6-2 20:26:00 | 只看该作者
    明白了~~可是为什么A就是不对呢????希望NN再指教一下,谢谢~!!
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-1 17:34
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部