ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8288|回复: 19
打印 上一主题 下一主题

63 篇 passage 33

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-2 09:27:00 | 只看该作者

63 篇 passage 33

Passage 33 (33/63)


Until recently most astronomers believed that the space between the galaxies in our universe was a near-perfect vacuum. This orthodox view of the universe is now being challenged by astronomers who believe that a heavy “rain” of gas is falling into many galaxies from the supposedly empty space around them. The gas apparently condenses into a collection of small stars, each a little larger than the planet Jupiter. These stars vastly outnumber the other stars in a given galaxy. The amount of “intergalactic rainfall” into some of these galaxies has been enough to double their mass in the time since they formed. Scientists have begun to suspect that this intergalactic gas is probably a mixture of gases left over from the “big bang” when the galaxies were formed and gas was forced out of galaxies by supernova explosions.


It is well known that when gas is cooled at a constant pressure its volume decreases. Thus, the physicist Fabian reasoned that as intergalactic gas cools, the cooler gas shrinks inward toward the center of the galaxy. Meanwhile its place is taken by hotter intergalactic gas from farther out on the edge of the galaxy, which cools as it is compressed and flows into the galaxy. The net result is a continuous flow of gas, starting as hot gases in intergalactic space and ending as a drizzle of cool gas called a “cooling flow,” falling into the central galaxy.


A fairly heretical idea in the 1970’s, the cooling-flow theory gained support when Fabian observed a cluster of galaxies in the constellation Perseus and found the central galaxy, NGC 1275, to be a strange-looking object with irregular, thin strands of gas radiating from it. According to previous speculation, these strands were gases that had been blown out by an explosion in the galaxy. Fabian, however, disagreed. Because the strands of gas radiating from NGC 1275 are visible in optical photographs, Fabian suggested that such strands consisted not of gas blown out of the galaxy but of cooling flows of gas streaming inward. He noted that the wavelengths of the radiation emitted by a gas would changes as the gas cooled, so that as the gas flowed into the galaxy and became cooler, it would emit not x-rays, but visible light, like that which was captured in the photographs. Fabian’s hypothesis was supported by Canizares’ determination in 1982 that most of the gas in the Perseus cluster was at a temperature of 80 million degrees Kelvin, whereas the gas immediately surrounding NGC 1275 (the subject of the photographs) was at one-tenth this temperature.


1.     The primary purpose of the passage is to


(A) illustrate a hypothesis about the origin of galaxies


(B) provide evidence to dispute an accepted theory about the evolution of galaxies


(C) summarize the state of and prospects for research in intergalactic astronomy


(D) report new data on the origins of intergalactic gasB


(E) reconcile opposing views on the formation of intergalactic gas



答案d 为什么不对呢?  我觉得文章主要讲的是intergalactic gas。 而b 是说 evolution of  galaxies.  而且很多新老观点的文章primary purpose 都不是refute 旧观点,而是支持论述新观点。  我感到迷惑,不知道怎样确定新老观点文章中的主题题。 不知道NN们有什么好的办法。请指教。  

沙发
发表于 2004-9-24 15:29:00 | 只看该作者

我和楼主有同样的疑问.

请问如何search别人的discussion? 好象唯一的方法就是search 33. 而我只看到这片讨论.

板凳
发表于 2005-3-1 08:45:00 | 只看该作者
ti
地板
发表于 2005-3-14 05:17:00 | 只看该作者

ding. I have the same question.

5#
发表于 2005-3-14 12:32:00 | 只看该作者

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=25&ID=88351

以上供参考。我觉得还是B概括了全文的中心意思。

6#
发表于 2005-6-12 05:33:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lindading在2004-9-2 9:27:00的发言:



答案d 为什么不对呢?  我觉得文章主要讲的是intergalactic gas。 而b 是说 evolution of  galaxies.  而且很多新老观点的文章primary purpose 都不是refute 旧观点,而是支持论述新观点。  我感到迷惑,不知道怎样确定新老观点文章中的主题题。 不知道NN们有什么好的办法。请指教。  


我有同样的问题。看了wangyu得全文解释,还是不知道为什么文章是讨论the evolution of galaxies的呀?总觉得是关于intergalactic gas的。所以选的时候,自动排除了A和B。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-12 5:33:51编辑过]
7#
发表于 2005-6-12 23:10:00 | 只看该作者

再问

8#
发表于 2005-6-13 19:52:00 | 只看该作者

The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) illustrate a hypothesis about the origin of galaxies
(B) provide evidence to dispute an accepted theory about the evolution of galaxies
(C) summarize the state of and prospects for research in intergalactic astronomy
(D) report new data on the origins of intergalactic gasB
(E) reconcile opposing views on the formation of intergalactic gas


文章开始提出传统理论,星系间为真空。后来提出新理论,星系间存在气体且使星系壮大。此后,文章对新理论进行了论据支持,从而反对了传统理论。传统理论和新理论的内容都是与星系演化紧密相关的。


供参考。

9#
发表于 2006-2-8 16:32:00 | 只看该作者

仅比较B里的evolution和D里的origins就能判断哪个好啊。


文章来回说气体怎么怎么冷却收缩东东,一直在说一个变化过程啊。新理论里气体本来就有,没说气体从哪里来,只说它怎么变变变! 哈哈


不论是 支持新的  还是  驳斥旧的, 横竖都体现了新老,那就行啦!


10#
发表于 2006-2-8 16:35:00 | 只看该作者

哎,刚才我好像误会LZ的意思了。


对啊对啊,新老对比,作者当然要就是新的!老的都认可,他何必要写啊。


所以主题当然是 支持新观点阿

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-30 18:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部