ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6427|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全34

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-25 02:52:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全34

Passage 34 (34/63)


Kazuko Nakane’s history of the early Japanese immigrants to central California’s Pajaro Valley focuses on the development of farming communities there from 1890 to 1940. The Issei (first-generation immigrants) were brought into the Pajaro Valley to raise sugar beets. Like Issei laborers in American cities, Japanese men in rural areas sought employment via the “boss” system. The system comprised three elements: immigrant wage laborers; Issei boardinghouses (boardinghouse: n.寄宿公寓) where laborers stayed; and labor contractors, who gathered workers for a particular job and then negotiated a contract between workers and employer. This same system was originally utilized by the Chinese laborers who had preceded the Japanese. A related institution was the “labor club,” which provided job information and negotiated employment contracts and other legal matters, such as the rental of land, for Issei who chose to belong and paid an annual fee to the cooperative for membership.


When the local sugar beet industry collapsed in 1902, the Issei began to lease land from the valley’s strawberry farmers. The Japanese provided the labor and the crop was divided between laborers and landowners. The Issei thus moved quickly from wage-labor employment to sharecropping (sharecrop: v.作佃农耕种) agreements. A limited amount of economic progress was made as some Issei were able to rent or buy farmland directly, while others joined together to form farming corporations. As the Issei began to operate farms,


they began to marry and start families, forming an established Japanese American community. Unfortunately, the Issei’s efforts to attain agricultural independence were hampered by government restrictions, such as the Alien Land Law of 1913. But immigrants could circumvent such exclusionary laws by leasing or purchasing land in their American-born children’s names


.


Nakane’s case study (case study: n.个案研究) of one rural Japanese American community provides valuable information about the lives and experiences of the Issei. It is, however, too particularistic (particularism: a tendency to explain complex social phenomena in terms of a single causative factor). This limitation derives from Nakane’s methodology—that of oral history—which cannot substitute for a broader theoretical or comparative perspective. Future research might well consider two issues raised by her study: were the Issei of the Pajaro Valley similar to or different from Issei in urban settings, and what variations existed between rural Japanese American communities?


1.     The primary purpose of the passage is to


(A) defend a controversial hypothesis presented in a history of early Japanese immigrants to California


(B) dismiss a history of an early Japanese settlement in California as narrow and ill constructed


(C) summarize and critique a history of an early Japanese settlement in California


(D) compare a history of one Japanese American community with studies of Japanese settlements throughout CaliforniaC


(E) examine the differences between Japanese and Chinese immigrants to central California in the 1890’s


2.     Which of the following best describes a “labor club,” as defined in the passage?


(A) An organization to which Issei were compelled to belong if they sought employment in the Pajaro Valley


(B) An association whose members included labor contractors and landowning “bosses”


(C) A type of farming corporation set up by Issei who had resided in the Pajaro Valley for some time


(D) A cooperative association whose members were dues-paying Japanese laborersD


(E) A social organization to which Japanese laborers and their families belonged


3.     Based on information in the passage, which of the following statements concerning the Alien Land Law of 1913 is most accurate?


(A) It excluded American-born citizens of Japanese ancestry from landownership.


(B) It sought to restrict the number of foreign immigrants to California.


(C) It successfully prevented Issei from ever purchasing farmland.


(D) It was applicable to first-generation immigrants but not to their American-born children.D


(E) It was passed under pressure from the Pajaro Valley’s strawberry farmers.


4.     Several Issei families join together to purchase a strawberry field and the necessary farming equipment. Such a situation best exemplifies which of the following, as it is described in the passage?


(A) A typical sharecropping agreement


(B) A farming corporation


(C) A “labor club”


(D) The “boss” systemB


(E) Circumvention of the Alien Land Law


5.     The passage suggests that which of the following was an indirect consequence of the collapse of the sugar beet industry in the Pajaro Valley?


(A) The Issei formed a permanent, family-based community.


(B) Boardinghouses were built to accommodate the Issei.


(C) The Issei began to lease land in their children’s names.


(D) The Issei adopted a labor contract system similar to that used by Chinese immigrants.A


(E) The Issei suffered a massive dislocation caused by unemployment.


6.     The author of the passage would most likely agree that which of the following, if it had been included in Nakane’s study, would best remedy the particularistic nature of that study?


(A) A statistical table comparing per capita income of Issei wage laborers and sharecroppers in the Pajaro Valley


(B) A statistical table showing per capita income of Issei in the Pajaro Valley from 1890 to 1940


(C) A statistical table showing rates of farm ownership by Japanese Americans in four central California counties from 1890 to 1940


(D) A discussion of original company documents dealing with the Pajaro Valley sugar beet industry at the turn of the centuryC


(E) Transcripts of interviews conducted with members of the Pajaro Valley Japanese American community who were born in the 1920’s and 1930’s


7.     It can be inferred from the passage that, when the Issei began to lease land from the Valley’s strawberry farmers, the Issei most probably did which of the following?


(A) They used profits made from selling the strawberry crop to hire other Issei.


(B) They negotiated such agricultural contracts using the “boss” system.


(C) They paid for the use of the land with a share of the strawberry crop.


(D) They earned higher wages than when they raised sugar beets.C


(E) They violated the Alien Land Law.



这篇的第五题,是从我用黑体标志的行数里找答案对吗,为什么答案是A呢?先谢谢了。

沙发
发表于 2004-6-25 03:32:00 | 只看该作者
Yes, you are right.  This sentence  "Asthe Issei began to operate farms, they began to marry and startfamilies, forming an established Japanese American community." indicates A is the right answer.
You can also eliminate all other choices first.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-25 03:53:00 | 只看该作者

是不是文中这句(forming an established Japanese American community.)说明的A

可是我排除不了其他答案呀,

(B)  Boardinghouses were built to accommodate the Issei   这儿都没说(不过第一段有),怎么是COLLAPSE 的DIRECTED CONSEQUENCE 呢?

(C) The Issei began to lease land in their children’s names都已经是这段的最后了,在forming an established Japanese American community

的后面了。

D也是第一段提到了,E也没提到。

请再解答,谢谢[

em06]

地板
发表于 2004-6-25 07:30:00 | 只看该作者

(B) "Boardinghouses" is discussed in Paragraph 1 (P1), "collapse of the sugar beet industry" is discussed in P2, we don't knowwhether boardinghouse had anything to do with the "collapse", thus B isout.
(C) "leasing land in their children’s names" is mentioned as a way tocircumvent Alien Land law, not a consequence of the "collapse", so C isout.
(D) is out for the similar reason as B.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-25 11:01:00 | 只看该作者

robertchu      谢谢你的解答,明白了。

我才发现我不知怎么想的,将题目的意思理解错了。我是想:题目问的是下面谁是INDIRECTED CONSEQUENCE,那么除了选出的答案,那其他的就应该是DIRECTED CONSEQUENCE.所以我想呀想,怎么也不明白其他的答案怎么就是DIRECTED CONSEQUENCE.

6#
发表于 2006-1-27 09:20:00 | 只看该作者
我跟你想的一样!还郁闷其他也不太对啊
7#
发表于 2006-8-29 23:37:00 | 只看该作者

C选项我觉得也是间接后果啊.sugar beet

industry collapse--lease land--find they can't gain agricultural independence--lease land in their children's names.谁能帮忙解释一下呢

8#
发表于 2006-11-1 11:38:00 | 只看该作者
the question asks about the indirect consequence of the collapse of suger beet, therefore whatever the answer is, it should be a consequence of the collapse. but choice C,"lease land in their children's names" is a consequence of the Alien Land Law.
9#
发表于 2007-4-2 18:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用windcolour在2006-8-29 23:37:00的发言:

industry collapse--lease land--find they can't gain agricultural independence--lease land in their children's names.谁能帮忙解释一下呢

我也还有同样的疑问。是不是一定要选择离“the cllapse”近的那个结果呢。总感觉A中的“permanent”不太合适,文中没有明确表面J建起了永久的community。

10#
发表于 2007-4-2 18:50:00 | 只看该作者

A limited amount of economic progress was made as some Issei were able to rent or buy farmland directly, while others joined together to form farming corporations.

请教这句话怎么翻译,可能问题有些弱弱的。

已经是破产成佃农了,还能买地?是不是我理解错了,请指点一下,谢谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-2 01:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部