ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12097|回复: 21
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再请教一道 gwd 非常感谢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-9 17:24:00 | 只看该作者

再请教一道 gwd 非常感谢

Q33 to Q36:
Scientists studying the physiology
of dinosaurs have long debated whether
dinosaurs were warm- or cold-blooded.
Line Those who suspect they were warm-
(5) blooded point out that dinosaur bone
is generally fibro-lamellar in nature;
because fibro-lamellar bone is formed
quickly, the bone fibrils, or filaments, are
laid down haphazardly. Consistent with
(10) their rapid growth rate, warm-blooded
animals, such as birds and mammals,
tend to produce fibro-lamellar bone,
whereas reptiles, which are slowgrowing
and cold-blooded, generally
(15) produce bone in which fibrils are laid
down parallel to each other. Moreover,
like the bone of birds and mammals,
dinosaur bone tends to be highly
vascularized, or filled with blood
(20) vessels. These characteristics,
first recognized in the 1930’s,
were documented in the 1960’s by
de Ricqlès, who found highly vascularized,
fibro-lamellar bone in several
(25) groups of dinosaurs. In the 1970’s,
Bakker cited these characteristics as
evidence for the warm-bloodedness of
dinosaurs. Although de Ricqlès urged
caution, arguing for an intermediate type
(30) of dinosaur physiology, a generation of
paleontologists has come to believe
that dinosaur bone is mammalianlike.
In the 1980’s, however, Bakker’s
23
contention began to be questioned, as a
(35) number of scientists found growth rings
in the bones of various dinosaurs that
are much like those in modern reptiles.
Bone growth in reptiles is periodic in
nature, producing a series of concentric
(40) rings in the bone, not unlike the growth
rings of a tree. Recently, Chinsamy
investigated the bones of two dinosaurs
from the early Jurassic period
(208-187 million years ago), and found
(45) that these bones also had growth rings;
however, they were also partially fibrolamellar
in nature. Chinsamy’s work
raises a question central to the debate
over dinosaur physiology: did dino-
(50) saurs form fibro-lamellar bone because
of an innately high metabolic rate associated
with warm-bloodedness or
because of periods of unusually fast
growth that occurred under favorable
(55) environmental conditions? (Although
modern reptiles generally do not form
fibro-lamellar bone, juvenile crocodiles
raised under optimal environmental
conditions do.) This question remains
(60) unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence
into account, one cannot make
a definitive statement about dinosaur
physiology on the basis of dinosaur
bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an
(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure
because their physiology was neither
typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q33:
The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that the “caution” (line 29) urged
by de Ricqlès regarding claims about dinosaur physiology was
A. unjustified by the evidence available to de Ricqlès
B. unnecessary, given the work done by Bakker and his followers
C. indicative of the prevailing scientific opinion at the time
D. warranted, given certain subsequent findings of other scientists
E. influential in the recent work of Chinsamy
Answer: d 我 a


这篇文章看了两遍了 最后还是认为自己的是正确的。 向大家求证~

沙发
发表于 2004-6-9 21:55:00 | 只看该作者

1. "Although de Ricqlès urged caution, arguing for an intermediate type of dinosaur physiology, a generation of paleontologists has come to believe that dinosaur bone is mammalianlike."---尽管de Ricqlès提出警告, 认为孔龙的生理特征是属于中间型(既不是爬行,也不是哺乳, 也不是鸟类), 但还是有古生物学家以他的发现推断出孔龙是哺乳的.

de Ricqlès的发现让其他学家感觉, 孔龙是暖血性动物, 但de Ricqlès本人则对他的发现比较谨慎, "警告"孔龙是可能是中间型的, 而非暖血等等.

2. 问题33是问本文的作者认为这个caution是怎么一回事. 他对这个警告持一个什么看法. 回答这个问题就要通读全文至最后一句. 仔细读最后一句, 这里就有了作者的观点---dinasaur可能是中间型的.

3. 再看答案D, (warranted---合理的, 有根据的.) 这个答案就是说---作者认为这个警告是合理的有根据的, 基于随后一些科学家(Chinsamy)的发现. 通过文章的最后一句判断, 答案D就对了.

4. 答案A的意思与答案D几乎是想反---通过de Ricqlès的发现, 作者认为这个警告是不合理的.


板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-9 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

The author of the passage would be most likely to agree

看了mm的解释我才发现阿。 原来是作者态度体! 我一直以为是名词解释题还在那句里穷搞。

非常感谢sigh~ 醋醋解题够强sigh!

地板
发表于 2005-8-26 16:37:00 | 只看该作者

indeed, taking all the evidence
into account, one cannot make
a definitive statement about dinosaur
physiology on the basis of dinosaur
bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an
(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure
because their physiology was neither
typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.


warranted是“to promise that something is true”的意思,即使选D,


D这个学者的caution也还是没被证实呀,请NN解惑

5#
发表于 2005-8-27 11:47:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得关键是什么被warranted. 不是具体的理论内容,而是学者们的谨慎和小心是可由文章得到确证,确实有疑惑待证明。
6#
发表于 2005-9-5 13:13:00 | 只看该作者

怎么会是D? 我觉得是A.unjustified by the evidence available to de Ricqlès


unjustifed不是不合理的意思吧,应该是未被证明是正确的. 所以根据当时de Ricqlès所掌握的evidence来说是不能证明的.直到Recently, Chinsamy investigated the bones of two dinosaurs from the early Jurassic period (208-187 million years ago), and found that these bones also had growth rings;however, they were also partially fibro-lamellar in nature.


不知道我理解有没有问题

7#
发表于 2005-9-12 03:48:00 | 只看该作者

醋醋妹妹地解释很道地呢,谢谢!

8#
发表于 2005-9-21 23:57:00 | 只看该作者
the caution 到最后也没被 wrranted 过,只是 may be, remains unanswerd.怎么选D?
9#
发表于 2005-10-10 14:35:00 | 只看该作者
醋醋的解释很受益
10#
发表于 2005-10-14 11:02:00 | 只看该作者

34题我选C.按新老观点型的文章,应该选C啊.我同意D更好.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 05:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部