ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3683|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教:XDF-Passage 63

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-3-9 09:26:00 | 只看该作者

请教:XDF-Passage 63

The fact that superior service can generate a competitiveadvantage for a company does not mean that every attemptat improving service will create such an advantage. Invest-ments in service, like those in production and distribution,
5)
must be balanced against other types of investments on thebasis of direct, tangible benefits such as cost reduction andincreased revenues. If a company is already effectively on apar with its competitors because it provides service thatavoids a damaging reputation and keeps customers from
10)
leaving at an unacceptable rate, then investment in higherservice levels may be wasted, since service is a decidingfactor for customers only in extreme situations.This truth was not apparent to managers of one regionalbank, which failed to improve its competitive position
15)
despite its investment in reducing the time a customer hadto wait for a teller. The bank managers did not recognizethe level of customer inertia in the consumer bankingindustry that arises from the inconvenience of switchingbanks. Nor did they analyze their service improvement to
20) determine whether it would attract new customers by pro-ducing a new standard of service that would excite cus-tomers or by proving difficult for competitors to copy. Theonly merit of the improvement was that it could easily bedescribed to customers.


2. According to the passage, investments in service arecomparable to investments in production anddistribution in terms of the
(A) tangibility of the benefits that they tend to confer
(B) increased revenues that they ultimately produce
(C) basis on which they need to be weighed
(D) insufficient analysis that managers devote to them
(E) degree of competitive advantage that they are likelyto provide


请教为什么选C不选A呢?

沙发
发表于 2006-3-12 10:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rynnchan在2006-3-9 9:26:00的发言:

The fact that superior service can generate a competitiveadvantage for a company does not mean that every attemptat improving service will create such an advantage. Invest-ments in service, like those in production and distribution,
5)
must be balanced against other types of investments on thebasis of direct, tangible benefits such as cost reduction andincreased revenues. If a company is already effectively on apar with its competitors because it provides service thatavoids a damaging reputation and keeps customers from
10)
leaving at an unacceptable rate, then investment in higherservice levels may be wasted, since service is a decidingfactor for customers only in extreme situations


2. According to the passage, investments in service arecomparable to investments in production anddistribution in terms of the
(A) tangibility of the benefits that they tend to confer
(B) increased revenues that they ultimately produce
(C) basis on which they need to be weighed
(D) insufficient analysis that managers devote to them
(E) degree of competitive advantage that they are likelyto provide


请教为什么选C不选A呢?


你应该是没懂高亮部分的意思吧。句子主干在must be那个section,要强调的是它必须和其他投资平衡,在哪个基础上平衡呢?在direct, tangible benefits方面,即直接的,有形的bebefits上平衡。A说的是tangibility of the benefits 只切了一小块不说,还把句意搞错了,句子不在说他们都能以有形的方式表示出来,而是强调他们需要和其他投资平衡。你可别看着字像就选哦

板凳
发表于 2010-8-20 13:22:08 | 只看该作者
5.The discussion of the regional bank (line 13-24) serves which of the following functions within the passage as a whole?
(A) It describes an exceptional case in which investment in service actually failed to produce a competitive advantage.
(E) It provides an example of the point about investment in service made in the first paragraph
我选了A,读来读去,觉得银行以改善服务为主要任务。比其它的Benefit还要重要。
首段第一句话说,since service is a deciding factor for customers only in extreme situations.在银行业果里不是那么明显。我想银行业应该当一个例外来考虑吧?
虽然E是答案,但是想不通,因为E是顺着第一段来的。
NN能否帮着诊断一下
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-29 20:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部