ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3102|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]GWD-1-36

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-27 21:32:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]GWD-1-36

      In corporate purchasing,


       competitive scrutiny is typically


       limited to suppliers of items that are


Line       directly related to end products.


  (5)       With “indirect” purchases (such as


computers, advertising, and legal


services), which are not directly


related to production, corporations


often favor “supplier partnerships”


(10)       (arrangements in which the


purchaser forgoes the right to


pursue alternative suppliers), which


can inappropriately shelter suppliers


from rigorous competitive scrutiny


(15)      that might afford the purchaser


economic leverage.  There are two


independent variables—availability


of alternatives and ease of changing


suppliersthat companies should


(20)      use to evaluate the feasibility of


               subjecting suppliers of indirect


               purchases to competitive scrutiny.


This can create four possible


situations.


(25)            In Type 1 situations, there are


many alternatives and change is


relatively easy.  Open pursuit of


alternatives—by frequent com-


petitive bidding, if possible—will


(30)      likely yield the best results.  In


Type 2 situations, where there


are many alternatives but change


       is difficult—as for providers of


employee health-care benefits—it


(35)     is important to continuously test


the market and use the results to


secure concessions from existing


suppliers.  Alternatives provide a


      credible threat to suppliers, even if


(40)     the ability to switch is constrained.


In Type 3 situations, there ate few


alternatives, but the ability to switch


without difficulty creates a threat that


companies can use to negotiate


(45)       concessions from existing suppliers.


In Type 4 situations, where there


are few alternatives and change


is difficult, partnerships may be


unavoidable.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Q36:


Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?


              



  • They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers.

  • They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.

  • They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser.

  • They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products.

  • They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited.

  • 答案给的时B,但在文中怎么找不到根据啊?我选了D,对应的句子在5-10行。是否答案有误?


    请高手指点。谢谢。

    沙发
    发表于 2005-4-28 09:55:00 | 只看该作者
    According to the context, such kind of partnership can be usedby the providers to raise additional profit, and thus puts thepurchasers into less economical situation. That's the right optiontrying to say... (look at line 13 to 16)

    The article doesn't mention the feasibility on which option D is focused.
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 04:52
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部