ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9757|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-3-14(也就是gwd-4-11)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-15 10:48:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-3-14(也就是gwd-4-11)



  In its 1903 decision in the case



       of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United


       States Supreme Court rejected the


Line       efforts of three Native American tribes


  (5)       to prevent the opening of tribal lands


to non-Indian settlement without tribal


consent.  In his study of the Lone


Wolf case, Blue Clark properly


emphasizes the Court’s assertion


(10)      of a virtually unlimited unilateral power


of Congress (the House of Represen-


tatives and the Senate) over Native


American affairs.  But he fails to note


the decision’s more far-reaching


(15)     impact:  shortly after Lone Wolf, the


federal government totally abandoned


negotiation and execution of formal


written agreements with Indian tribes


as a prerequisite for the implemen-


(20)      tation of federal Indian policy.  Many


commentators believe that this change


had already occurred in 1871 when—


following a dispute between the


       House and the Senate over which


(25)       chamber should enjoy primacy in


Indian affairs—Congress abolished


the making of treaties with Native


American tribes.  But in reality the


federal government continued to nego-


(30)      tiate formal tribal agreements past


the turn of the century, treating these


documents not as treaties with sover-


       eign nations requiring ratification by the


Senate but simply as legislation to be


(35)       passed by both houses of Congress.


       The Lone Wolf decision ended this


era of formal negotiation and finally


did away with what had increasingly


become the empty formality of obtain-


ing tribal consent.



Q14:


As an element in the argument presented by the author of the passage, the reference to Blue Clark’s study of the Lone Wolf case serves primarily to                     




  1. point out that this episode in Native American history has received inadequate attention from scholars
  2. support the contention of the author of the passage that the Lone Wolf decision had a greater long-term impact than did the congressional action of 1871
  3. challenge the validity of the Supreme Court’s decision confirming the unlimited unilateral power of Congress in Native American affairs
  4. refute the argument of commentators who regard the congressional action of 1871 as the end of the era of formal negotiation between the federal government and Native American tribes

E. introduce a view about the Lone Wolf decision that the author will expand upon


答案是E,我没有什莫头绪,请牛牛指教!

沙发
发表于 2005-4-15 16:14:00 | 只看该作者

赫赫,这道题目当时我也做错了!当时我选了A,struggle了好久啊!呵呵,不知道MM选了那个啊?

这道题型是典型的in order to,问作者提及Blue Clark’s study of the Lone Wolf case得目的何在? 首先我们分析一下文章的逻辑层次:首先说高院反驳了印第安部落的要求。然后提到了BC这个人对这个case得研究:他正确的强调了什莫什莫,但是没有意识到这个决定的深远影响。接着剩下的部分长篇累牍的描述深远影响。所以我们可以看出来,深远影响的描述才是文章的重点,而BC这个人研究的评价只是一个引子,为了引出对深远影响得描述作铺垫。

我们在看一下选项:只有E刚好表达这个意思。A比较具有混淆性。但是A不对,尽管BC没有意识到深远影响,但是作者的意图并不在于说明学者们没有足够重视这段时期。而且这一点也不能有文中推出,即不能由BC没有意识到深远影响-->学者们没有足够重视这段时期,没有其他学者的信息,但是BC不足以说明这个问题。

由此可见,理解文章的逻辑层次是多末的重要。请从文章的逻辑层次着手。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-4-16 03:34:00 | 只看该作者

明白啦,太感谢了!

理解文章确实逻辑层次最重要了,我现在的问题就是似乎文章看懂了,但是题就是做不对,估计应该还是逻辑层次把握不好,真不知道应该怎魔办啊,苦恼ing~

地板
发表于 2005-4-16 11:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sinorachel在2005-4-16 3:34:00的发言:

明白啦,太感谢了!


理解文章确实逻辑层次最重要了,我现在的问题就是似乎文章看懂了,但是题就是做不对,估计应该还是逻辑层次把握不好,真不知道应该怎魔办啊,苦恼ing~



多看OG对于主体题型的解释,试着自己去做同样的分析,相信会有提高!
5#
发表于 2005-7-10 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢而今的精彩解释!

6#
发表于 2005-7-25 14:26:00 | 只看该作者

而今的解释太棒了,多谢!

7#
发表于 2005-10-8 01:12:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢!


另外做in order to题的时候,要注意上下文


这题也可以从作者提到BC后紧跟的一句话推出:


But he fails to note


the decision’s more far-reaching


(15)      impact:  后面一堆是作者重心

8#
发表于 2005-10-8 03:56:00 | 只看该作者

E.“introduce a view about the Lone Wolf decision that the author will expand upon”


我觉得E的不足在于,E认为author will expand upon 的就是这个BCview,事实上,我承认BCview是一个引子,但只是引出作者说he fails to… …”,然后作者开始阐述后面一堆BC fails to 的东西,所以,作者并不是在BCview上面expand upon,而是另起炉灶重点阐述别的东西。


我还是觉得A好。因为作者阐述的是BC没有发觉的东西,所以说明BC这样的scholar曾经对这个Lone Wolf  paid attention to, 但是inadequate! 非常完美的答案啊,为什么会有歧义呢?

9#
发表于 2006-5-31 00:55:00 | 只看该作者
no any information shows the passage interests on scholar attention... so I think it slip away from the main idea, thus a cannot be correct.
10#
发表于 2006-8-5 15:46:00 | 只看该作者
太感谢拉
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 04:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部