ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5235|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og-104

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-7-25 10:54:00 | 只看该作者

og-104

1. spending on reseach and development by united states businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8 percent over the 1983 level. this increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981-when outlays for reseach and development increased 164 percent over 1980 spending. clealy the 25percent tax credit enacted by congress in 1981,which was intended to promote spending on research and development, didi little or nothing to stimulate such spending.
    the conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

the answer is "in the absence of the 25percent tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was."  

i understand 'without tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have been substantially lower than it was.'
可我决觉得答案和刚好和它解释的逻辑相反?
沙发
发表于 2003-7-25 12:35:00 | 只看该作者
不矛盾吧
答案的逆否命题不就是再说 substantially lower --->25% tax credit,不就是tax是下降的原因嘛
所以才能得出文中的结论,就是tax根本就没起到促进的作用啊!!对不
板凳
发表于 2005-8-7 18:34:00 | 只看该作者

斑竹解说的只是d,还没看明白d和对应的解释的关系。费心再指点一下,谢谢!

地板
发表于 2005-8-7 22:17:00 | 只看该作者

题目说1981年开始征的税,本来是要促进spending的,但是没效果。


答案说:如果没有征税,那么1981年以后的spending不会比征了税以后的spending低多少。


这正说明了有没有征税结果都差不多,即题干中说的 tax credit did little or nothing to stimulate such spending。

5#
发表于 2005-8-9 09:07:00 | 只看该作者

'without tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have been substantially lower than it was.'
这句是对d地解释,“如果没有征税,81年后的spending会比征税后低很多?这是怎么回事?og解释有问题吗?

6#
发表于 2005-8-9 11:25:00 | 只看该作者

The conclusion that the tax credit did nothing to stimulate spending on research and development would not be true if, without the credit, such spending would have been even lower than it actually was. Thus choice D must be true for the conclusion to be true and is the best answer.


请5楼的看涂了颜色的部分

7#
发表于 2006-9-13 23:53:00 | 只看该作者

对的,d是说有没有它都无所谓(tax credit),so d supports the conclusion!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 05:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部