不能複製, 手打的, 請大家幫忙看看: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) in M is 60% higher now than it was 4 years ago. The corresponding increase for P is only 10%. These figures support the conclusion that residents of M are more likely to become victims of violent crime than are residents of P. The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account: B how the rate of population growth in M over the past 4 years compares to the corresponding rate for P D the violent crime rates in M and P 4 years ago 我同意D是對的, 可是B是在講什麼啊? "how the rate... compares to..." 腦筋轉不過來, 它是在說誰跟誰比, 比什麼啊? |