ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3451|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全-A-10

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-20 16:17:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]大全-A-10

Questions 10-11 are based on the following


As one who has always believed that truth is our nation’s surest weapon in the propaganda war against our foes, I am distressed by reports of “disinformation” campaigns by American intelligence agents in Western Europe. In a disinformation campaign, untruths are disseminated through gullible local journalists in order to damage the interests of our enemies and protect our own. Those who defend this practice say that lying is necessary to counter Soviet disinformation campaigns aimed at damaging America’s political interests. These apologists contend that one must fight fire with fire. I would point out to the apologists that the fire department finds water more effective.


10.   The author of the passage above bases his conclusion on which of the following?


(A) A circular definition of “disinformation”


(B) An example of the ineffectiveness of lying as a weapon in the propaganda war


(C) An analogy between truth and water


(D) An appeal to the authority of the fire department   C


(E) An attack on the character of American intelligence agents in Western Europe



答案c  我选e



没看懂哪个是conclusion.


为什么选c?c 能算basis 吗?



请教!


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-20 21:14:00 | 只看该作者
up,up!
板凳
发表于 2004-12-21 04:34:00 | 只看该作者

Up,Up,Up,

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-24 21:35:00 | 只看该作者
没人顶,我再顶!
5#
发表于 2004-12-24 21:50:00 | 只看该作者

作者说以火攻火,自然是把火比做假情报,作者又说水比火好,按照作者的意思, 水要和真话联系才可以做这样的结论,否则结论不成立了。


E里提到WEST EUROPEN,但是作者的结论论述里还包括Soviet, 这就没法解释了。

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-28 13:43:00 | 只看该作者

太谢谢了!

这下总算明白了!

7#
发表于 2006-3-26 14:35:00 | 只看该作者
B怎么不对?
8#
发表于 2006-5-16 16:14:00 | 只看该作者

文中只是提到lying,但是没有说美国的lying有没有效果啊

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 22:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部