ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2111|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-12-9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-7 09:04:00 | 只看该作者

大全-12-9

大全-12-9.      In 1990 all of the people who applied for a job at Evco also applied for a job at Radeco, and Evco and Radeco each offered jobs to half of these applicants. Therefore, every one of these applicants must have been offered a job in 1990.


The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions about these job applicants?


(A) All of the applicants were very well qualified for a job at either Evco or Radeco.


(B) All of the applicants accepted a job at either Evco or Radeco.


(C) None of the applicants was offered a job by both Evco and Radeco.


(D) None of the applicants had applied for jobs at places other than Evco and Radeco.C


(E) None of the applicants had previously worked for either Evco or Radeco.


Why not b?


谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-12-7 09:24:00 | 只看该作者

B中的accepted是无关概念。

C中如果有人同时接受了两个公司的offer,那么肯定有人没有拿到offer,导致原文结论不成立。所以C是原文的必要条件。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-7 09:38:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢leeon,明白了。我总是对“无关概念”不敏感,真是很羡慕你们的火眼金睛!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 02:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部