ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 20164|回复: 34
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-6-4 是这么理解吗?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-4 13:06:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-6-4 是这么理解吗?

Q4:


In the past the country of Siduria has relied heavily on imported oil.  Siduria recently implemented a program to convert heating systems from oil to natural gas.  Siduria already produces more natural gas each year than it burns, and oil production in Sidurian oil fields is increasing at a steady pace.  If these trends in fuel production and usage continue, therefore, Sidurian reliance on foreign sources for fuel should decline soon.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?




  • In Siduria the rate of fuel consumption is rising no more quickly than the rate of fuel production.


  • Domestic production of natural gas is rising faster than is domestic production of oil in Siduria.


  • No fuel other than natural gas is expected to be used as a replacement for oil in Siduria.


  • Buildings cannot be heated by solar energy rather than by oil or natural gas.


  • All new homes that are being built will have natural-gas-burning heating systems.


  • 答案为A  A取非就变成在S燃料的消耗量比生产量增长的要快 这就削弱了文中的结论 文章是说油和天然气的生产都在增长 ??是这么理解吗?? 不好意思 我的假设题做的特别差 所以想确认一下这题的解题思路  谢谢了


    沙发
    发表于 2004-11-4 13:56:00 | 只看该作者

    Deny A, we get "In Siduria the rate of fuel (i.e. oil) consumption is rising quickly than the rate of fuel production."  If so, and if the gap between oil consumption and domestic production can not be offset by the reduced demand of heating oil, S will still needs to import more foreign oil -- the original argument is weakened.  So, A is a necessary assumption.

    板凳
    发表于 2004-11-4 19:27:00 | 只看该作者

    你是对的

    地板
     楼主| 发表于 2004-11-5 07:57:00 | 只看该作者
    十分感谢
    5#
    发表于 2004-12-13 21:44:00 | 只看该作者

    xiexie 我也明白了/

    6#
    发表于 2005-5-21 18:51:00 | 只看该作者

    A:取飞,总消耗增长量快于总生产量,还是要进口

    B:无关比较

    C:取非,只有天然气可以用作石油的替代品,对原文没有影响

    D:取非,太阳能可以用来供暖,out of scope

    E:All不好,太绝对

    7#
    发表于 2005-9-9 11:21:00 | 只看该作者

    NN们,这题我怎么上了鬼子的当呢?


    原题中说"Siduria already produces more natural gas each year than it burns, and oil production in Sidurian oil fields is increasing at a steady pace.  If these trends in fuel production and usage continue",


    如果天然气总是生产的比使用的多,那不就是说已经把A排除了吗?


    我选了C,尽管有些勉强.


    理由:题中结论是"Sidurian reliance on foreign sources for fuel should decline soon",但这个fuel 不一定等同于Gas或Oil. 感觉上像个逻辑上常见的概念变化.


    假如C成立,那可能该国还计划用别的燃料代替石油,如果这种燃料也可能是进口来的,就不能得出结论了.


    感觉GMAT逻辑思路总是不那么清晰.答案有时不是那么有说服力.如果这题没有"If these trends in fuel production and usage continue"这句话,我绝对会选A.


    请NN指点一下.多谢!

    8#
    发表于 2005-9-14 06:34:00 | 只看该作者

    你指出的原文是说gas,选项A是说fuel,没有关系啊,怎么能直接排除呢

    9#
    发表于 2005-9-22 16:52:00 | 只看该作者

    有个问题


    fuel应该包括oil和natural gas


    这样理解对吗?

    10#
    发表于 2005-12-14 17:15:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用kinci在2005-11-13 15:13:00的发言:
    这题怎么排除C呢? C到底怎么取非削弱呢?下面的取非意思好像不对:C:取非,只有天然气可以用作石油的替代品

    MM你搞错了,C没取非的意思就已经是“除了天然气没有其他的燃料可以被用来取代石油”

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 22:32
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部