ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block the escape of heat into space. So emission of these "greenhouse" gases contributes to global warming. In order to reduce global warming, emission of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced. Therefore, the methane now emitted from open landfills should instead be burned to produce electricity.Objection: The burning of methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere.

Which of the following, if true, most adequately counters the objection made to the proposal?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 16965|回复: 38
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-6-32

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-2 06:11:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-6-32

GWD-6-Q32:


Proposal:  Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block the escape of heat into space.  So emission of these “greenhouse” gases contributes to global warming.  In order to reduce global warming, emission of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced.  Therefore, the methane now emitted from open landfills should instead be burned to produce electricity.



Objection:  The burning of methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere.



Which of the following, if true, most adequately counters the objection made to the proposal?




  • Every time a human being or other mammal exhales, there is some carbon dioxide released into the air.


  • The conversion of methane to electricity would occur at a considerable distance from the landfills.


  • The methane that is used to generate electricity would generally be used as a substitute for a fuel that does not produce any greenhouse gases when burned.


  • Methane in the atmosphere is more effective in blocking the escape of heat from the Earth than is carbon dioxide.


  • The amount of methane emitted from the landfills could be reduced if the materials whose decomposition produces methane were not discarded, but recycled.

  • 请问E为何不对



    谢谢

    沙发
    发表于 2004-11-2 08:59:00 | 只看该作者

    建议者说燃烧甲烷可以减小温室效应;反对者说燃烧甲烷产生二氧化碳->温室效应;题干问反对反对者;

    D说甲烷比二氧化碳产生的温室效应更厉害,也就是说燃烧还是能减少温室效应的。

    E说如果将分解甲烷的原料循环使用,产生的甲烷会减少。这个明显不在原文的逻辑推理范围当中,和反对者的话没关系,是beyond scope。

    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2004-11-2 09:27:00 | 只看该作者
    leeon, 我的逻辑还差得远啊
    地板
    发表于 2004-11-2 10:41:00 | 只看该作者
    我觉得你的逻辑已经不错了,不过GWD的有些题目比较绕。要牢牢把握原文的推理。任何推理以外的东西通常都是无关选项。+U
    5#
    发表于 2004-11-2 12:35:00 | 只看该作者
    E是无关选项啊,根本起不到反对OBJECTION的作用。
    6#
    发表于 2004-11-18 17:37:00 | 只看该作者
    why C is wrong ?   Thanks !
    7#
    发表于 2005-1-8 08:31:00 | 只看该作者

    why c is wrong?  It also puzzled me. NN ,please come

    8#
    发表于 2005-1-14 12:38:00 | 只看该作者
    C说通过燃烧产生电的methane会被用来替代一种fuel, 而这种fuel在燃烧时不产生任何温室气体。明显,这种fuel对环境好得多,削弱了烧methane的建议。
    9#
    发表于 2005-3-11 10:36:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用billgong在2005-1-14 12:38:00的发言:
    C说通过燃烧产生电的methane会被用来替代一种fuel, 而这种fuel在燃烧时不产生任何温室气体。明显,这种fuel对环境好得多,削弱了烧methane的建议。

    我也困扰了好长时间,谢谢!

    10#
    发表于 2005-5-21 20:56:00 | 只看该作者

    C:The methane that is used to generate electricity would generally be used as a substitute for a fuel that does not produce any greenhouse gases when burned.

    要注意题目的focus,要反对的是:The burning of methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere.

    那C说甲烷会用来发电,这不是明显无关吗

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 21:37
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部