ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia's coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.

Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 23286|回复: 42
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] GWD-1-14

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-28 12:04:00 | 只看该作者

[求助] GWD-1-14

答案是A, 可是藕觉得不对。


题干中这句话怎么理解??



Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago


藕觉得她只是说现在的生产率是5年前的两倍,过去5年间的生产率是多少无从而知,所以答案A.....不知道怎么得出来的?


Q14:
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia's coal industry.  Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.


Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia's total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.
C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.
D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine's overall output has declined or remained constant.
E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.

沙发
发表于 2004-10-28 12:33:00 | 只看该作者

每名矿工的生产率在5年时间内翻了一倍,所以A说如果矿工数量不变,那么总产量肯定是翻了一倍了。

总产量=矿工数量x每名矿工的生产率

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-28 18:31:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用leeon在2004-10-28 12:33:00的发言:

每名矿工的生产率在5年时间内翻了一倍,


对,应该是这样解释。但想想这个翻倍的过程,从一倍到两倍,时间跨度是5年。可能前4年都是一倍,只最后一年发生了变化到2倍。如果是这样,即使矿工人数不遍,5年的产量也不会翻倍。

地板
发表于 2004-10-29 16:27:00 | 只看该作者

G-craker, 题目比较的只是第6年和第1年的数据,和5年中任何一年产量或累计产量等都无关吧。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-31 00:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用jennifer8在2004-10-29 16:27:00的发言:

G-craker, 题目比较的只是第6年和第1年的数据,和5年中任何一年产量或累计产量等都无关吧。


对呀,是无关。这就是为什么A藕觉得不对,A讲的是5年中的产量会翻倍,藕推不出来,is there anybody elso, who can prove A is correct?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia's total coal production has doubled in that period of time.

6#
发表于 2004-10-31 01:16:00 | 只看该作者

你只管头管尾就行了。


原文:Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago:现在每个矿工煤产量是5年前的两倍。就是说5年前是1倍,现在就是2倍。


A:Tribnia's total coal production has doubled in that period of time意思为:在这5年中,产量翻了两倍。就是说现在产量是5年前的2倍。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-31 11:47:19编辑过]
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-31 11:20:00 | 只看该作者

藕晓得的,只管头尾。Thank u, lawyer.

8#
发表于 2004-11-1 16:02:00 | 只看该作者
嗯...只要管五年前和現在就可以囉!!
9#
发表于 2004-11-9 01:16:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用leeon在2004-10-28 12:33:00的发言:

每名矿工的生产率在5年时间内翻了一倍,所以A说如果矿工数量不变,那么总产量肯定是翻了一倍了。


总产量=矿工数量x每名矿工的生产率


总产量=矿工数量x每名矿工的生产率*(working time/矿工)


矿工数量x每名矿工的生产率=mine的生产率


So, I think A is not really logical.  Right?

10#
发表于 2004-11-9 08:37:00 | 只看该作者
这里Coal output per miner 是每名矿工的产量,不用乘以工作时间,我上面译为生产率并不是很标准,但上面的算式应该没问题。所以答案A没问题。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 00:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部