GWD 32
Press secretary: Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive报复的 desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90% of the projects cancelled were in such districts. But all of the cancelled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?
A. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
B. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
C. The number of projects cancelled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
D. (Omitted)
E. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective客观存在的 assessment of government projects
搜索前人们的帖子,我怎么愣没看明白,为什么选B啊,能不能不对B取非,说明为什么选B啊(因为取非后,有点明白,但不取非,脑就晕了)
|