ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 18981|回复: 39
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-4-8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-13 15:30:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-4-8

Q8:


From 1980 to 1989, total consumption of fish in the country of Jurania increased by 4.5 percent, and total consumption of poultry products there increased by 9.0 percent.  During the same period, the population of Jurania increased by 6 percent, in part due to immigration to Jurania from other countries in the region.






If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them?






  1. During the 1980’s in Jurania, profits of wholesale distributors of poultry products increased at a greater rate than did profits of wholesale distributors of fish.

  2. For people who immigrated to Jurania during the 1980’s, fish was less likely to be a major part of their diet than was poultry.

  3. In 1989 Juranians consumed twice as much poultry as fish.

  4. For a significant proportion of Jurania’s population, both fish and poultry products were a regular part of their diet during the 1980’s.

  5. Per capita consumption of fish in Jurania was lower in 1989 than in 1980.

答案给的是C,偶觉得C明显错误,应该E


沙发
发表于 2004-10-14 11:58:00 | 只看该作者

The answer is E

板凳
发表于 2004-11-1 17:58:00 | 只看该作者

各位大俠,請幫我解釋一下題目好嗎?


我只看懂1.魚的消費量增加4.5%


             2.家禽的消費量增加9%


             3.人口增加6%


然後就不知道題目到底想考什麼了

地板
发表于 2004-11-1 18:53:00 | 只看该作者

问题是:如果原文的信息是对的,问你哪个选项必然对。

由你说的1,3条就可推出E。故E一定对。

5#
发表于 2004-11-1 18:54:00 | 只看该作者
可以看清楚这些,应该可以做题了,人口增加,鱼的消费减少,不是说明每人消费的鱼少了么?
6#
发表于 2004-11-2 17:22:00 | 只看该作者
应该是鱼的增加没有人口增加得多,所以人均消费的鱼减少。
7#
发表于 2005-2-16 16:41:00 | 只看该作者

假设原来人有n个现在是n*(1+6%)

原来消费鱼m条现在是m*(1+4.5%)

原来人均消费鱼m/n

现在人均消费鱼1.045m/1.06n

显然人均消费鱼少了

8#
发表于 2005-7-30 14:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用whitesand在2004-11-2 17:22:00的发言:
应该是鱼的增加没有人口增加得多,所以人均消费的鱼减少。

准确。

9#
发表于 2005-7-30 14:26:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用icekun在2005-2-16 16:41:00的发言:

假设原来人有n个现在是n*(1+6%)


原来消费鱼m条现在是m*(1+4.5%)


原来人均消费鱼m/n


现在人均消费鱼1.045m/1.06n


显然人均消费鱼少了


不错,解释的很好。顶

10#
发表于 2005-9-2 15:46:00 | 只看该作者

我选了B,


家禽消费量的增加超过人口增加的比例,鱼消费量的增加小于人口增加的比例,不正说明,新加入的人口的食物消费结构是家禽大于鱼的吗?


谁给解释一下我错在哪里好吗?


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 15:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部